CCSO vs. SRHQ

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

CCSO (Carbon Collective Climate Solutions U.S. Equity ETF) and SRHQ (SRH U.S. Quality ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CCSO is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Carbon Collective, while SRHQ is a Quality Factor fund tracking the SRH US Quality Index - Benchmark TR Gross. CCSO is actively managed, while SRHQ is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CCSO returned 7.88%/yr vs 17.26%/yr for SRHQ. Their 0.69 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. Both charge a 0.35% expense ratio.

Performance

CCSO vs. SRHQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Carbon Collective Climate Solutions U.S. Equity ETF (CCSO) and SRH U.S. Quality ETF (SRHQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCSO achieves a 6.31% return, which is significantly lower than SRHQ's 20.78% return.

CCSO

• 1D: -0.75%
• 1M: -3.67%
• 6M: -0.85%
• YTD: 6.31%
• 1Y: 12.92%
• 3Y*: 7.88%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 8.05%

SRHQ

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: 1.86%
• 6M: 18.75%
• YTD: 20.78%
• 1Y: 31.30%
• 3Y*: 17.26%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 18.88%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CCSO Carbon Collective Climate Solutions U.S. Equity ETF	$68.20K	$82.96K	$97.75K
SRHQ SRH U.S. Quality ETF	$113.47K	$63.13K	$30.03K

CCSO vs. SRHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
CCSO Carbon Collective Climate Solutions U.S. Equity ETF	6.31%	21.79%	3.89%	14.58%	-8.39%
SRHQ SRH U.S. Quality ETF	20.78%	7.34%	16.49%	21.81%	5.22%

Correlation

The correlation between CCSO and SRHQ is 0.50, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.50
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.66
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 5, 2022	0.69

The correlation between CCSO and SRHQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (1 year) to 0.69 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CCSO vs. SRHQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CCSO	SRHQ
Industrials	52.2%	20.4%
Basic Materials	15.2%	2.7%
Technology	10.0%	21.9%
Consumer Cyclical	8.8%	11.3%
Utilities	6.9%	1.2%
Energy	6.4%	1.2%
Financial Services	0.5%	10.2%
Consumer Defensive	0.1%	5.2%
Communication Services	-	2.1%
Healthcare	-	21.4%
Real Estate	-	1.2%

Return for Risk

CCSO vs. SRHQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CCSO

CCSO Risk / Return Rank: 24
CCSO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
CCSO Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
CCSO Omega Ratio Rank: 22
CCSO Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
CCSO Martin Ratio Rank: 26

SRHQ

SRHQ Risk / Return Rank: 87
SRHQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
SRHQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
SRHQ Omega Ratio Rank: 80
SRHQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
SRHQ Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CCSO vs. SRHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Carbon Collective Climate Solutions U.S. Equity ETF (CCSO) and SRH U.S. Quality ETF (SRHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CCSO	SRHQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.50	1.97	-1.48
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.83	2.80	-1.97
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.34	-0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.76	4.64	-3.87
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.18	16.85	-14.67

CCSO vs. SRHQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCSO Sharpe Ratio is 0.50, which is lower than the SRHQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCSO and SRHQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CCSO vs. SRHQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCSO drawdown since its inception was -23.69%, which is greater than SRHQ's maximum drawdown of -18.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCSO and SRHQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	CCSO	SRHQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.69%	-18.50%	-5.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.75%	-6.31%	-8.44%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.82%	-18.50%	-4.32%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.82%	-1.47%	-11.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.26%	-2.98%	-4.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.17%	1.74%	+3.43%

Volatility

CCSO vs. SRHQ - Volatility Comparison

Carbon Collective Climate Solutions U.S. Equity ETF (CCSO) has a higher volatility of 6.20% compared to SRH U.S. Quality ETF (SRHQ) at 4.37%. This indicates that CCSO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SRHQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CCSO	SRHQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.20%	4.37%	+1.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.11%	11.10%	+7.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.74%	14.90%	+7.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.28%	15.96%	+7.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.28%	15.96%	+7.32%

CCSO vs. SRHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CCSO and SRHQ have an expense ratio of 0.35%.

Dividends

CCSO vs. SRHQ - Dividend Comparison

CCSO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, less than SRHQ's 0.69% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
CCSO Carbon Collective Climate Solutions U.S. Equity ETF	0.60%	0.63%	0.53%	0.80%	0.24%
SRHQ SRH U.S. Quality ETF	0.69%	0.76%	0.66%	0.84%	0.27%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CCSO and SRHQ in my portfolio?

CCSO and SRHQ have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CCSO or SRHQ?

CCSO has higher volatility (6.20%) compared to SRHQ (4.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCSO dropped -23.69% vs SRHQ's -18.50%.

Which ETF is better, CCSO or SRHQ?

On 3-year performance, SRHQ leads with 17.26% vs 7.88% for CCSO. Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. On volatility, SRHQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CCSO or SRHQ?

Over the 3-year period, SRHQ has performed better with a 17.26% return vs 7.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CCSO or SRHQ?

CCSO and SRHQ have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CCSO or SRHQ?

SRHQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.69%, compared with 0.60% for CCSO.

What is the main difference between CCSO and SRHQ?

CCSO is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while SRHQ is Quality Factor. They also come from different issuers: Carbon Collective and SRH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SRHQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.