CCSO vs. RUNN

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Carbon Collective Climate Solutions U.S. Equity ETF (CCSO) and Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF (RUNN).

CCSO and RUNN are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CCSO is an actively managed fund by Carbon Collective. It was launched on Sep 19, 2022. RUNN is an actively managed fund by Running Oak Capital. It was launched on Jun 7, 2023.

Performance

CCSO vs. RUNN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Carbon Collective Climate Solutions U.S. Equity ETF (CCSO) and Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF (RUNN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CCSO vs. RUNN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
CCSO Carbon Collective Climate Solutions U.S. Equity ETF	4.39%	21.79%	3.89%	6.05%
RUNN Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF	-3.39%	2.30%	17.16%	12.05%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCSO achieves a 4.39% return, which is significantly higher than RUNN's -3.39% return.

CCSO

• 1D: 3.93%
• 1M: -6.59%
• YTD: 4.39%
• 6M: 3.47%
• 1Y: 35.06%
• 3Y*: 11.79%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RUNN

• 1D: 2.05%
• 1M: -6.61%
• YTD: -3.39%
• 6M: -5.49%
• 1Y: -0.13%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCSO vs. RUNN - Expense Ratio Comparison

CCSO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than RUNN's 0.58% expense ratio.

RUNN

Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF

CCSO

Carbon Collective Climate Solutions U.S. Equity ETF

Return for Risk

CCSO vs. RUNN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCSO

CCSO Risk / Return Rank: 79
CCSO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
CCSO Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
CCSO Omega Ratio Rank: 72
CCSO Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
CCSO Martin Ratio Rank: 80

RUNN

RUNN Risk / Return Rank: 12
RUNN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
RUNN Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
RUNN Omega Ratio Rank: 11
RUNN Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
RUNN Martin Ratio Rank: 13

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCSO vs. RUNN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Carbon Collective Climate Solutions U.S. Equity ETF (CCSO) and Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF (RUNN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CCSO	RUNN	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.46	-0.01	+1.47
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.09	0.11	+1.98
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.01	+0.25
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.70	0.05	+2.64
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.78	0.15	+8.63
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CCSO vs. RUNN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCSO Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is higher than the RUNN Sharpe Ratio of -0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCSO and RUNN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CCSO	RUNN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.46	-0.01	+1.47
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.37	0.70	-0.33

Correlation

The correlation between CCSO and RUNN is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

CCSO vs. RUNN - Dividend Comparison

CCSO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, more than RUNN's 0.57% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
CCSO Carbon Collective Climate Solutions U.S. Equity ETF	0.61%	0.63%	0.53%	0.80%	0.24%
RUNN Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF	0.57%	0.55%	0.39%	0.33%	0.00%

Drawdowns

CCSO vs. RUNN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCSO drawdown since its inception was -23.69%, which is greater than RUNN's maximum drawdown of -16.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCSO and RUNN.

Drawdown Indicators

	CCSO	RUNN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.69%	-16.83%	-6.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.09%	-10.60%	-2.49%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.15%	-8.26%	+0.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.25%	-3.35%	-3.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.02%	3.79%	+0.23%

Volatility

CCSO vs. RUNN - Volatility Comparison

Carbon Collective Climate Solutions U.S. Equity ETF (CCSO) has a higher volatility of 8.63% compared to Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF (RUNN) at 4.34%. This indicates that CCSO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RUNN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CCSO	RUNN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.63%	4.34%	+4.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.81%	9.86%	+6.95%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.04%	16.68%	+7.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.17%	13.88%	+9.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.17%	13.88%	+9.29%