CCRV vs. UYLD
CCRV (iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF) and UYLD (Angel Oak Ultrashort Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CCRV is a Commodities fund tracking the CCRV-US - ICE BofA Commodity Enhanced Carry Index, while UYLD is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Angel Oak. CCRV is passively managed, while UYLD is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. CCRV charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for UYLD.
Performance
CCRV vs. UYLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CCRV
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UYLD
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 0.67%
- YTD
- 1.91%
- 6M
- 2.37%
- 1Y
- 5.18%
- 3Y*
- 5.89%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CCRV vs. UYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCRV iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF | 0.00% | -0.05% | 5.74% | 5.47% | 4.26% |
UYLD Angel Oak Ultrashort Income ETF | 1.91% | 5.36% | 6.10% | 6.90% | 1.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between CCRV and UYLD is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2022 | -0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CCRV vs. UYLD — Risk / Return Rank
CCRV
UYLD
CCRV vs. UYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF (CCRV) and Angel Oak Ultrashort Income ETF (UYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CCRV | UYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 8.00 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 5.98 | — |
Drawdowns
CCRV vs. UYLD - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CCRV | UYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -0.54% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.14% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.54% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -0.01% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -0.03% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.02% | — |
Volatility
CCRV vs. UYLD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CCRV | UYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.38% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.50% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.65% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 1.00% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 1.00% | — |
CCRV vs. UYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
CCRV has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than UYLD's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
CCRV vs. UYLD - Dividend Comparison
CCRV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.03%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCRV iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.43% | 7.26% | 33.27% | 26.22% |
UYLD Angel Oak Ultrashort Income ETF | 5.03% | 5.07% | 4.97% | 5.92% | 0.75% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CCRV and UYLD have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, UYLD is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UYLD is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for CCRV.
UYLD has the higher dividend yield at 5.03%, compared with 0.00% for CCRV.
CCRV is categorized as Commodities, while UYLD is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Angel Oak. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for CCRV and 0.29% for UYLD.
Find the right allocation for CCRV and UYLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer