PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CCRV vs. MWOFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CCRV vs. MWOFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF (CCRV) and MFS Global Growth Fund (MWOFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


CCRV

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MWOFX

1D
0.54%
1M
1.40%
YTD
-1.90%
6M
-1.13%
1Y
4.21%
3Y*
8.12%
5Y*
4.10%
10Y*
10.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCRV vs. MWOFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
CCRV
iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF
0.00%-0.05%5.74%5.47%19.91%33.78%7.37%
MWOFX
MFS Global Growth Fund
-1.90%7.17%10.68%20.63%-19.28%18.33%11.71%

Correlation

The correlation between CCRV and MWOFX is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2020

0.16

The correlation between CCRV and MWOFX shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.16 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CCRV vs. MWOFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCRV

MWOFX
MWOFX Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
MWOFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MWOFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
MWOFX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
MWOFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
MWOFX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCRV vs. MWOFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF (CCRV) and MFS Global Growth Fund (MWOFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CCRV vs. MWOFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CCRVMWOFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

Drawdowns

CCRV vs. MWOFX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CCRVMWOFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.39%

Volatility

CCRV vs. MWOFX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CCRVMWOFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.61%

CCRV vs. MWOFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CCRV has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than MWOFX's 1.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

CCRV vs. MWOFX - Dividend Comparison

CCRV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MWOFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.53%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CCRV
iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF
0.00%0.00%4.43%7.26%33.27%26.22%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MWOFX
MFS Global Growth Fund
5.53%5.42%5.14%2.09%3.60%6.25%3.13%1.86%5.00%3.43%1.68%6.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


CCRV and MWOFX have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CCRV and MWOFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer