CCRV vs. IWM

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

CCRV (iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF) and IWM (iShares Russell 2000 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CCRV is a Commodities fund tracking the CCRV-US - ICE BofA Commodity Enhanced Carry Index, while IWM is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CCRV charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for IWM.

Performance

CCRV vs. IWM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF (CCRV) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CCRV

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IWM

• 1D: -0.96%
• 1M: 3.82%
• YTD: 20.47%
• 6M: 17.64%
• 1Y: 40.90%
• 3Y*: 19.22%
• 5Y*: 6.27%
• 10Y*: 11.58%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCRV vs. IWM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
CCRV iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF	0.00%	-0.05%	5.74%	5.47%	19.91%	33.78%	7.16%
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF	20.47%	12.66%	11.38%	16.83%	-20.48%	14.54%	24.59%

Correlation

The correlation between CCRV and IWM is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.06
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.13
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.20
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2020	0.22

The correlation between CCRV and IWM shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.22 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

CCRV vs. IWM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCRV

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

IWM

IWM Risk / Return Rank: 67
IWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
IWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
IWM Omega Ratio Rank: 57
IWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
IWM Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCRV vs. IWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF (CCRV) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CCRV	IWM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.08	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.86	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.34	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.73	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	13.18	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	CCRV	IWM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-59.05%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-11.03%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-27.50%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-31.91%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-41.13%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-0.96%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-10.75%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.11%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CCRV	IWM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	6.56%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	14.31%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	19.74%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	22.61%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	23.06%	—

CCRV vs. IWM - Expense Ratio Comparison

CCRV has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than IWM's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

CCRV vs. IWM - Dividend Comparison

CCRV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CCRV iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF	0.00%	0.00%	4.43%	7.26%	33.27%	26.22%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF	0.90%	1.04%	1.15%	1.35%	1.48%	0.94%	1.04%	1.26%	1.40%	1.26%	1.38%	1.54%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CCRV and IWM in my portfolio?

CCRV and IWM have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CCRV or IWM?

On fees, IWM is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CCRV or IWM?

IWM is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for CCRV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CCRV or IWM?

IWM has the higher dividend yield at 0.90%, compared with 0.00% for CCRV.

What is the main difference between CCRV and IWM?

CCRV is categorized as Commodities, while IWM is Small Cap Blend Equities. CCRV tracks CCRV-US - ICE BofA Commodity Enhanced Carry Index, while IWM tracks Russell 2000 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for CCRV and 0.19% for IWM.