CCRV vs. IBTF
CCRV (iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF) and IBTF (iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Treasury ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CCRV is a Commodities fund tracking the CCRV-US - ICE BofA Commodity Enhanced Carry Index, while IBTF is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2025 Maturity US Treasury Index. Both are passively managed. Their -0.04 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. CCRV charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for IBTF.
Performance
CCRV vs. IBTF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CCRV
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
IBTF
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 1Y
- 1.44%
- 3Y*
- 3.64%
- 5Y*
- 0.80%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 1.11%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
CCRV vs. IBTF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCRV iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF | 0.00% | -0.05% | 5.74% | 5.47% | 19.91% | 33.78% | 7.16% |
IBTF iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Treasury ETF | 0.00% | 3.81% | 4.60% | 4.12% | -6.39% | -2.31% | -0.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between CCRV and IBTF is -0.18, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | -0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2020 | -0.04 |
The correlation between CCRV and IBTF shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to -0.03 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CCRV vs. IBTF — Risk / Return Rank
CCRV
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IBTF
CCRV vs. IBTF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF (CCRV) and iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Treasury ETF (IBTF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CCRV | IBTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 7.12 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 39.94 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 258.91 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CCRV vs. IBTF - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CCRV | IBTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -10.45% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.43% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -9.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | 0.00% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -3.24% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.01% | — |
Volatility
CCRV vs. IBTF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CCRV | IBTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.00% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.06% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.29% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 2.35% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 2.53% | — |
CCRV vs. IBTF - Expense Ratio Comparison
CCRV has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than IBTF's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
CCRV vs. IBTF - Dividend Comparison
CCRV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IBTF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCRV iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.43% | 7.26% | 33.27% | 26.22% | 0.00% |
IBTF iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Treasury ETF | 1.37% | 3.83% | 4.32% | 4.03% | 1.93% | 0.57% | 0.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CCRV and IBTF have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IBTF is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBTF is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for CCRV.
IBTF has the higher dividend yield at 1.37%, compared with 0.00% for CCRV.
CCRV is categorized as Commodities, while IBTF is Government Bonds. CCRV tracks CCRV-US - ICE BofA Commodity Enhanced Carry Index, while IBTF tracks ICE 2025 Maturity US Treasury Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for CCRV and 0.07% for IBTF.
Find the right allocation for CCRV and IBTF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer