PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CCRV vs. HYDW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CCRV vs. HYDW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF (CCRV) and Xtrackers Low Beta High Yield Bond ETF (HYDW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


CCRV

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HYDW

1D
0.00%
1M
0.18%
YTD
1.07%
6M
1.43%
1Y
5.94%
3Y*
6.90%
5Y*
3.61%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCRV vs. HYDW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
CCRV
iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF
0.00%-0.05%5.74%5.47%19.91%33.78%7.37%
HYDW
Xtrackers Low Beta High Yield Bond ETF
1.07%8.47%5.42%9.84%-7.86%2.77%2.83%

Correlation

The correlation between CCRV and HYDW is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2020

0.14

The correlation between CCRV and HYDW shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (1 year) to 0.14 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CCRV vs. HYDW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCRV

HYDW
HYDW Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
HYDW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYDW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYDW Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
HYDW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYDW Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCRV vs. HYDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF (CCRV) and Xtrackers Low Beta High Yield Bond ETF (HYDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CCRV vs. HYDW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CCRVHYDWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

Drawdowns

CCRV vs. HYDW - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CCRVHYDWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.44%

Volatility

CCRV vs. HYDW - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CCRVHYDWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.99%

CCRV vs. HYDW - Expense Ratio Comparison

CCRV has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than HYDW's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

CCRV vs. HYDW - Dividend Comparison

CCRV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HYDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.74%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
CCRV
iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF
0.00%0.00%4.43%7.26%33.27%26.22%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HYDW
Xtrackers Low Beta High Yield Bond ETF
5.74%5.75%5.35%5.69%4.78%3.30%4.45%4.56%4.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


CCRV and HYDW have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HYDW is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HYDW is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for CCRV.

HYDW has the higher dividend yield at 5.74%, compared with 0.00% for CCRV.

CCRV is categorized as Commodities, while HYDW is High Yield Bonds. CCRV tracks CCRV-US - ICE BofA Commodity Enhanced Carry Index, while HYDW tracks Solactive USD High Yield Corporates Total Market Low Beta Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for CCRV and 0.20% for HYDW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CCRV and HYDW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer