CCRV vs. CMDT

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF (CCRV) and PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund (CMDT).

CCRV and CMDT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CCRV is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the CCRV-US - ICE BofA Commodity Enhanced Carry Index. It was launched on Sep 1, 2020. CMDT is a passively managed fund by PIMCO that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Total Return Index. It was launched on May 9, 2023. Both CCRV and CMDT are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

CCRV vs. CMDT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF (CCRV) and PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund (CMDT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CCRV vs. CMDT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
CCRV iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF	0.00%	-0.05%	5.74%	9.34%
CMDT PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund	16.96%	12.78%	6.93%	5.50%

Returns By Period

CCRV

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CMDT

• 1D: -0.74%
• 1M: 8.58%
• YTD: 16.96%
• 6M: 19.62%
• 1Y: 24.37%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCRV vs. CMDT - Expense Ratio Comparison

CCRV has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than CMDT's 0.65% expense ratio.

CMDT

PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund

CCRV

iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF

Return for Risk

CCRV vs. CMDT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMDT

CMDT Risk / Return Rank: 87
CMDT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
CMDT Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
CMDT Omega Ratio Rank: 85
CMDT Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
CMDT Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCRV vs. CMDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF (CCRV) and PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund (CMDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CCRV	CMDT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.85	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	1.22	—

Correlation

The correlation between CCRV and CMDT is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

CCRV vs. CMDT - Dividend Comparison

CCRV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CMDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CCRV iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF	0.00%	0.00%	4.43%	7.26%	33.27%	26.22%
CMDT PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund	2.60%	3.04%	8.80%	2.71%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	CCRV	CMDT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-9.69%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-9.21%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-0.74%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-2.79%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.51%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CCRV	CMDT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.26%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	9.59%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	13.23%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	12.13%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	12.13%	—