CCRV vs. ACWI
CCRV (iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF) and ACWI (iShares MSCI ACWI ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CCRV is a Commodities fund tracking the CCRV-US - ICE BofA Commodity Enhanced Carry Index, while ACWI is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Country World Index. Both are passively managed. Their 0.23 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. CCRV charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for ACWI.
Performance
CCRV vs. ACWI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CCRV
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
ACWI
- 1D
- 0.97%
- 1M
- 1.15%
- 6M
- 8.65%
- YTD
- 12.35%
- 1Y
- 24.97%
- 3Y*
- 19.75%
- 5Y*
- 10.91%
- 10Y*
- 12.51%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.52%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $355.08M | $458.17M | $501.32M |
CCRV vs. ACWI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCRV iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF | 0.00% | -0.05% | 5.74% | 5.47% | 19.91% | 33.78% | 7.16% |
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF | 12.35% | 22.41% | 17.45% | 22.27% | -18.39% | 18.66% | 8.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between CCRV and ACWI is -0.08, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2020 | 0.23 |
The correlation between CCRV and ACWI shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CCRV vs. ACWI — Risk / Return Rank
CCRV
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ACWI
CCRV vs. ACWI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF (CCRV) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CCRV | ACWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.32 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.58 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.76 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CCRV vs. ACWI - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CCRV | ACWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -56.00% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.73% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.55% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.53% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -0.63% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -8.55% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.33% | — |
Volatility
CCRV vs. ACWI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CCRV | ACWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.14% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.71% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 13.99% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 16.23% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 17.07% | — |
CCRV vs. ACWI - Expense Ratio Comparison
CCRV has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than ACWI's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
CCRV vs. ACWI - Dividend Comparison
CCRV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ACWI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF | 1.42% | 1.55% | 1.70% | 1.88% | 1.79% | 1.71% | 1.43% | 2.33% | 2.18% | 1.94% | 2.19% | 2.56% |
CCRV iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.43% | 7.26% | 33.27% | 26.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CCRV and ACWI have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ACWI is cheaper at 0.32% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ACWI is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for CCRV.
ACWI has the higher dividend yield at 1.42%, compared with 0.00% for CCRV.
CCRV is categorized as Commodities, while ACWI is Global Equities. CCRV tracks CCRV-US - ICE BofA Commodity Enhanced Carry Index, while ACWI tracks MSCI All Country World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for CCRV and 0.32% for ACWI.
Find the right allocation for CCRV and ACWI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer