CCRSX vs. EAPCX
Compare and contrast key facts about Credit Suisse Trust Commodity Return Strategy Portfolio (CCRSX) and Parametric Commodity Strategy Fund Class A (EAPCX).
CCRSX is managed by Credit Suisse. It was launched on Feb 27, 2006. EAPCX is managed by Eaton Vance. It was launched on May 25, 2011.
Performance
CCRSX vs. EAPCX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CCRSX vs. EAPCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCRSX Credit Suisse Trust Commodity Return Strategy Portfolio | 22.81% | 15.37% | 4.86% | -8.88% | 15.71% | 28.00% | -1.49% | 6.69% | -11.63% | -7.99% |
EAPCX Parametric Commodity Strategy Fund Class A | 17.25% | 22.06% | 9.63% | -4.87% | 17.26% | 29.92% | 7.77% | 9.19% | -9.60% | 6.71% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CCRSX achieves a 22.81% return, which is significantly higher than EAPCX's 17.25% return. Over the past 10 years, CCRSX has underperformed EAPCX with an annualized return of 6.76%, while EAPCX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.17% annualized return.
CCRSX
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 8.67%
- YTD
- 22.81%
- 6M
- 28.77%
- 1Y
- 29.52%
- 3Y*
- 4.65%
- 5Y*
- 13.30%
- 10Y*
- 6.76%
EAPCX
- 1D
- 0.79%
- 1M
- 5.49%
- YTD
- 17.25%
- 6M
- 25.77%
- 1Y
- 32.66%
- 3Y*
- 15.07%
- 5Y*
- 16.10%
- 10Y*
- 11.17%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CCRSX vs. EAPCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CCRSX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than EAPCX's 0.91% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CCRSX vs. EAPCX — Risk / Return Rank
CCRSX
EAPCX
CCRSX vs. EAPCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Credit Suisse Trust Commodity Return Strategy Portfolio (CCRSX) and Parametric Commodity Strategy Fund Class A (EAPCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CCRSX | EAPCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.80 | 2.25 | -0.45 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.32 | 2.83 | -0.51 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.41 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.33 | 3.70 | -0.37 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.03 | 12.97 | -3.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CCRSX | EAPCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.80 | 2.25 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 | 1.11 | -1.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.04 | 0.84 | -0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.00 | 0.29 | -0.29 |
Correlation
The correlation between CCRSX and EAPCX is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CCRSX vs. EAPCX - Dividend Comparison
CCRSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.29%, which matches EAPCX's 11.28% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCRSX Credit Suisse Trust Commodity Return Strategy Portfolio | 11.29% | 3.98% | 2.95% | 26.59% | 18.97% | 4.82% | 5.51% | 0.86% | 2.91% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EAPCX Parametric Commodity Strategy Fund Class A | 11.28% | 13.23% | 5.46% | 3.43% | 14.80% | 13.74% | 3.01% | 1.11% | 0.41% | 4.98% | 6.49% |
Drawdowns
CCRSX vs. EAPCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CCRSX drawdown since its inception was -93.56%, which is greater than EAPCX's maximum drawdown of -52.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCRSX and EAPCX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CCRSX | EAPCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.56% | -52.59% | -40.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.12% | -9.09% | -0.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -83.30% | -18.05% | -65.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -83.30% | -28.81% | -54.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -42.05% | -0.39% | -41.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -51.17% | -23.03% | -28.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.37% | 2.60% | +0.77% |
Volatility
CCRSX vs. EAPCX - Volatility Comparison
Credit Suisse Trust Commodity Return Strategy Portfolio (CCRSX) has a higher volatility of 7.01% compared to Parametric Commodity Strategy Fund Class A (EAPCX) at 4.58%. This indicates that CCRSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EAPCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CCRSX | EAPCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.01% | 4.58% | +2.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.40% | 11.78% | +1.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.61% | 14.85% | +1.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 225.84% | 14.64% | +211.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 159.86% | 13.29% | +146.57% |