CCRP vs. VCIT

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

CCRP (Columbia Corporate Bond ETF) and VCIT (Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds. CCRP is actively managed, while VCIT is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CCRP charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VCIT.

Performance

CCRP vs. VCIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Corporate Bond ETF (CCRP) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCRP achieves a 0.72% return, which is significantly higher than VCIT's 0.18% return.

CCRP

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: 0.51%
• YTD: 0.72%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VCIT

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: 0.28%
• YTD: 0.18%
• 6M: 0.07%
• 1Y: 6.13%
• 3Y*: 6.00%
• 5Y*: 1.22%
• 10Y*: 2.93%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCRP vs. VCIT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CCRP Columbia Corporate Bond ETF	0.72%	-0.12%
VCIT Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF	0.18%	0.09%

Correlation

The correlation between CCRP and VCIT is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2025	0.92

Return for Risk

CCRP vs. VCIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VCIT

VCIT Risk / Return Rank: 42
VCIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
VCIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
VCIT Omega Ratio Rank: 40
VCIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
VCIT Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCRP vs. VCIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Corporate Bond ETF (CCRP) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CCRP	VCIT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.50	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.19	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.47	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.27	0.75	-0.48

Drawdowns

CCRP vs. VCIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCRP drawdown since its inception was -2.72%, smaller than the maximum VCIT drawdown of -20.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCRP and VCIT.

Drawdown Indicators

	CCRP	VCIT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.72%	-20.56%	+17.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-2.96%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-6.11%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-20.56%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-20.56%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.83%	-1.36%	+0.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.83%	-3.16%	+2.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.88%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CCRP	VCIT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.38%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	3.06%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.79%	4.10%	+0.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.79%	6.61%	-1.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.79%	6.28%	-1.49%

CCRP vs. VCIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

CCRP has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than VCIT's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

CCRP vs. VCIT - Dividend Comparison

CCRP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%, less than VCIT's 4.80% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CCRP Columbia Corporate Bond ETF	2.03%	0.25%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VCIT Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF	4.80%	4.62%	4.43%	3.72%	3.03%	2.87%	2.78%	3.37%	3.61%	3.21%	3.29%	3.34%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CCRP and VCIT in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, CCRP and VCIT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, CCRP or VCIT?

On fees, VCIT is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CCRP or VCIT?

VCIT is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for CCRP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CCRP or VCIT?

VCIT has the higher dividend yield at 4.80%, compared with 2.03% for CCRP.

What is the main difference between CCRP and VCIT?

They also come from different issuers: Columbia Threadneedle and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for CCRP and 0.04% for VCIT.