CCRP vs. BBCB

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CCRP (Columbia Corporate Bond ETF) and BBCB (JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds. CCRP is actively managed, while BBCB is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CCRP charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for BBCB.

Performance

CCRP vs. BBCB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Corporate Bond ETF (CCRP) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (BBCB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCRP achieves a 0.48% return, which is significantly lower than BBCB's 2.82% return.

CCRP

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: 0.67%
• YTD: 0.48%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BBCB

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: 0.66%
• YTD: 2.82%
• 6M: 2.66%
• 1Y: 8.37%
• 3Y*: 5.98%
• 5Y*: 0.84%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCRP vs. BBCB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CCRP Columbia Corporate Bond ETF	0.48%	-0.12%
BBCB JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF	2.82%	0.01%

Correlation

The correlation between CCRP and BBCB is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2025	0.93

CCRP vs. BBCB - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CCRP	BBCB
Financial Services	4.4%	21.9%
Basic Materials	-	1.6%
Communication Services	-	6.7%
Consumer Cyclical	-	6.3%
Consumer Defensive	-	5.1%
Energy	-	4.9%
Healthcare	-	8.8%
Industrials	-	7.1%
Real Estate	-	3.8%
Technology	-	7.8%
Utilities	-	8.6%

Return for Risk

CCRP vs. BBCB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBCB

BBCB Risk / Return Rank: 56
BBCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
BBCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
BBCB Omega Ratio Rank: 55
BBCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
BBCB Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCRP vs. BBCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Corporate Bond ETF (CCRP) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (BBCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CCRP	BBCB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.71	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.12	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.16	0.46	-0.30

Drawdowns

CCRP vs. BBCB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCRP drawdown since its inception was -2.72%, smaller than the maximum BBCB drawdown of -22.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCRP and BBCB.

Drawdown Indicators

	CCRP	BBCB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.72%	-22.48%	+19.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-2.95%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-6.46%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-22.32%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.07%	-0.34%	-0.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.83%	-6.66%	+5.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.83%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CCRP	BBCB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.41%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	3.98%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.78%	4.93%	-0.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.78%	7.25%	-2.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.78%	7.50%	-2.72%

CCRP vs. BBCB - Expense Ratio Comparison

CCRP has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than BBCB's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

CCRP vs. BBCB - Dividend Comparison

CCRP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%, less than BBCB's 7.15% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BBCB JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF	7.15%	5.02%	5.22%	4.22%	3.39%	3.47%	4.59%	5.25%	0.20%
CCRP Columbia Corporate Bond ETF	2.03%	0.25%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CCRP and BBCB in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, CCRP and BBCB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, CCRP or BBCB?

On fees, BBCB is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CCRP or BBCB?

BBCB is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for CCRP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CCRP or BBCB?

BBCB has the higher dividend yield at 7.15%, compared with 2.03% for CCRP.

What is the main difference between CCRP and BBCB?

They also come from different issuers: Columbia Threadneedle and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for CCRP and 0.09% for BBCB.