PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CCOYX vs. BFOCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CCOYX vs. BFOCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund Institutional 3 Class (CCOYX) and Berkshire Focus Fund (BFOCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CCOYX having a 58.87% return and BFOCX slightly higher at 60.81%.


CCOYX

1D
3.67%
1M
15.59%
YTD
58.87%
6M
55.61%
1Y
127.06%
3Y*
48.12%
5Y*
27.23%
10Y*

BFOCX

1D
-0.27%
1M
19.71%
YTD
60.81%
6M
57.53%
1Y
100.22%
3Y*
52.74%
5Y*
13.57%
10Y*
22.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCOYX vs. BFOCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CCOYX
Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund Institutional 3 Class
58.87%37.79%27.11%44.77%-30.92%39.45%44.92%54.68%-7.78%19.33%
BFOCX
Berkshire Focus Fund
60.81%28.67%59.16%50.20%-65.06%-1.79%90.81%40.56%10.04%30.16%

Correlation

The correlation between CCOYX and BFOCX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2017

0.81

The correlation between CCOYX and BFOCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CCOYX vs. BFOCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCOYX
CCOYX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
CCOYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCOYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCOYX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
CCOYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCOYX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

BFOCX
BFOCX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
BFOCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BFOCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
BFOCX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
BFOCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
BFOCX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCOYX vs. BFOCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund Institutional 3 Class (CCOYX) and Berkshire Focus Fund (BFOCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CCOYXBFOCXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

5.06

2.84

+2.22

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

5.25

3.14

+2.12

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.71

1.43

+0.29

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

10.72

6.07

+4.65

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

41.63

17.65

+23.98

CCOYX vs. BFOCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCOYX Sharpe Ratio is 5.06, which is higher than the BFOCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCOYX and BFOCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CCOYXBFOCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.06

2.84

+2.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.04

0.31

+0.73

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.04

0.26

+0.78

Drawdowns

CCOYX vs. BFOCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCOYX drawdown since its inception was -37.16%, smaller than the maximum BFOCX drawdown of -95.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCOYX and BFOCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CCOYXBFOCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.16%

-95.80%

+58.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.31%

-17.22%

+4.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.08%

-40.55%

+11.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.16%

-72.53%

+35.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.27%

+0.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.69%

-58.17%

+50.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.17%

5.91%

-2.74%

Volatility

CCOYX vs. BFOCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund Institutional 3 Class (CCOYX) is 7.25%, while Berkshire Focus Fund (BFOCX) has a volatility of 13.22%. This indicates that CCOYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BFOCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CCOYXBFOCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.25%

13.22%

-5.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.07%

29.39%

-9.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.09%

36.86%

-10.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.21%

43.52%

-17.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.76%

37.56%

-10.80%

CCOYX vs. BFOCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CCOYX has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is lower than BFOCX's 1.94% expense ratio.


Dividends

CCOYX vs. BFOCX - Dividend Comparison

CCOYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.09%, while BFOCX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BFOCX
Berkshire Focus Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%19.54%21.20%14.20%5.70%21.73%0.14%9.52%
CCOYX
Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund Institutional 3 Class
5.09%8.08%12.32%4.60%8.17%10.62%9.52%10.61%11.42%10.60%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CCOYX and BFOCX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BFOCX has higher volatility (13.22%) compared to CCOYX (7.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCOYX dropped -37.16% vs BFOCX's -95.80%.

CCOYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.06 vs 2.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CCOYX and BFOCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer