CCOM vs. ZSC
CCOM (Simplify Chinese Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF) and ZSC (USCF Sustainable Commodity Strategy Fund) are both Commodities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CCOM charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for ZSC.
Performance
CCOM vs. ZSC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CCOM
- 1D
- -1.01%
- 1M
- -1.94%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZSC
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- 0.21%
- YTD
- 9.47%
- 6M
- 15.02%
- 1Y
- 36.39%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CCOM vs. ZSC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CCOM Simplify Chinese Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF | -1.23% |
ZSC USCF Sustainable Commodity Strategy Fund | 1.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between CCOM and ZSC is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2026 | 0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CCOM vs. ZSC — Risk / Return Rank
CCOM
ZSC
CCOM vs. ZSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Chinese Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF (CCOM) and USCF Sustainable Commodity Strategy Fund (ZSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CCOM | ZSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.88 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.26 | 0.22 | -0.47 |
Drawdowns
CCOM vs. ZSC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CCOM drawdown since its inception was -5.40%, smaller than the maximum ZSC drawdown of -26.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCOM and ZSC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CCOM | ZSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.40% | -26.49% | +21.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.28% | -2.71% | -0.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.30% | -14.74% | +12.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.48% | — |
Volatility
CCOM vs. ZSC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CCOM | ZSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.19% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.09% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.57% | 12.70% | +0.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.57% | 12.24% | +1.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.57% | 12.24% | +1.33% |
CCOM vs. ZSC - Expense Ratio Comparison
CCOM has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than ZSC's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
CCOM vs. ZSC - Dividend Comparison
CCOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, less than ZSC's 1.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CCOM Simplify Chinese Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF | 0.82% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZSC USCF Sustainable Commodity Strategy Fund | 1.60% | 1.75% | 2.18% | 1.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CCOM and ZSC have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZSC is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZSC is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for CCOM.
ZSC has the higher dividend yield at 1.60%, compared with 0.82% for CCOM.
They also come from different issuers: Simplify and USCF. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for CCOM and 0.59% for ZSC.
Find the right allocation for CCOM and ZSC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer