PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CCOI vs. TAN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CCOI vs. TAN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cogent Communications Holdings, Inc. (CCOI) and Invesco Solar ETF (TAN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCOI achieves a -19.64% return, which is significantly lower than TAN's 43.40% return. Over the past 10 years, CCOI has underperformed TAN with an annualized return of -3.65%, while TAN has yielded a comparatively higher 13.36% annualized return.


CCOI

1D
5.49%
1M
-4.15%
YTD
-19.64%
6M
-7.59%
1Y
-62.53%
3Y*
-31.15%
5Y*
-21.50%
10Y*
-3.65%

TAN

1D
0.21%
1M
16.03%
YTD
43.40%
6M
46.63%
1Y
112.68%
3Y*
-0.45%
5Y*
-1.61%
10Y*
13.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCOI vs. TAN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CCOI
Cogent Communications Holdings, Inc.
-19.64%-70.14%7.19%41.23%-17.20%27.78%-5.33%51.98%4.25%14.33%
TAN
Invesco Solar ETF
43.40%48.31%-37.61%-26.79%-5.24%-25.10%233.96%66.53%-25.67%54.38%

Correlation

The correlation between CCOI and TAN is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2008

0.35

The correlation between CCOI and TAN shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (1 year) to 0.35 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CCOI vs. TAN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCOI
CCOI Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
CCOI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCOI Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCOI Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
CCOI Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCOI Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

TAN
TAN Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
TAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
TAN Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
TAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
TAN Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCOI vs. TAN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cogent Communications Holdings, Inc. (CCOI) and Invesco Solar ETF (TAN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CCOITANDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.87

1.44

-0.57

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.90

8.32

-9.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.34

20.11

-21.45

CCOI vs. TAN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCOI Sharpe Ratio is -0.73, which is lower than the TAN Sharpe Ratio of 3.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCOI and TAN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CCOITANDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.73

3.05

-3.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.45

-0.04

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.09

0.35

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.06

-0.12

+0.06

Drawdowns

CCOI vs. TAN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCOI drawdown since its inception was -96.52%, roughly equal to the maximum TAN drawdown of -95.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCOI and TAN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CCOITANDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.52%

-95.29%

-1.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-69.30%

-13.62%

-55.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-80.02%

-64.40%

-15.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-80.02%

-73.95%

-6.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.02%

-78.53%

-1.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-78.07%

-67.65%

-10.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-59.19%

-78.51%

+19.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

46.77%

5.62%

+41.15%

Volatility

CCOI vs. TAN - Volatility Comparison

Cogent Communications Holdings, Inc. (CCOI) has a higher volatility of 24.11% compared to Invesco Solar ETF (TAN) at 11.73%. This indicates that CCOI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TAN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CCOITANDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.11%

11.73%

+12.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

69.05%

25.32%

+43.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

85.50%

37.11%

+48.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

47.57%

39.73%

+7.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.80%

37.97%

+2.83%

Dividends

CCOI vs. TAN - Dividend Comparison

CCOI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.22%, while TAN has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CCOI
Cogent Communications Holdings, Inc.
6.22%14.15%5.09%4.94%6.23%4.33%4.64%3.71%4.69%3.97%3.65%4.21%
TAN
Invesco Solar ETF
0.00%0.00%0.50%0.09%0.00%0.00%0.09%0.30%0.69%1.77%5.04%1.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


CCOI and TAN have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CCOI has higher volatility (24.11%) compared to TAN (11.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCOI dropped -96.52% vs TAN's -95.29%.

TAN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.05 vs -0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CCOI and TAN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer