CCO.TO vs. POWL
CCO.TO (Cameco Corporation) and POWL (Powell Industries, Inc.) are both stocks. CCO.TO operates in Uranium (Energy), while POWL operates in Electrical Equipment & Parts (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, CCO.TO returned 26.60%/yr vs 41.76%/yr for POWL. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CCO.TO vs. POWL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CCO.TO is traded in CAD, while POWL is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the POWL values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CCO.TO achieves a 12.21% return, which is significantly lower than POWL's 183.24% return. Over the past 10 years, CCO.TO has underperformed POWL with an annualized return of 26.60%, while POWL has yielded a comparatively higher 41.76% annualized return.
CCO.TO
- 1D
- 2.17%
- 1M
- -4.70%
- YTD
- 12.21%
- 6M
- 11.96%
- 1Y
- 56.08%
- 3Y*
- 49.98%
- 5Y*
- 40.56%
- 10Y*
- 26.60%
POWL
- 1D
- 1.65%
- 1M
- 1.22%
- YTD
- 183.24%
- 6M
- 166.30%
- 1Y
- 385.05%
- 3Y*
- 150.16%
- 5Y*
- 99.88%
- 10Y*
- 41.76%
CCO.TO vs. POWL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCO.TO Cameco Corporation | 12.21% | 70.37% | 29.62% | 86.52% | 11.71% | 62.18% | 48.65% | -24.97% | 34.00% | -14.67% |
POWL Powell Industries, Inc. | 183.24% | 37.89% | 173.57% | 149.54% | 32.22% | 3.55% | -39.09% | 93.27% | -2.35% | -29.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between CCO.TO and POWL is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2006 | 0.25 |
The correlation between CCO.TO and POWL shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (all time) to 0.36 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CCO.TO:
CA$61.44B
POWL:
$10.77B
CCO.TO:
CA$1.49
POWL:
$5.12
CCO.TO:
94.41
POWL:
57.59
CCO.TO:
0.79
POWL:
0.09
CCO.TO:
17.36
POWL:
9.51
CCO.TO:
8.70
POWL:
15.19
CCO.TO:
CA$3.54B
POWL:
$1.13B
CCO.TO:
CA$1.13B
POWL:
$340.78M
CCO.TO:
CA$818.74M
POWL:
$236.11M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CCO.TO vs. POWL — Risk / Return Rank
CCO.TO
POWL
CCO.TO vs. POWL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cameco Corporation (CCO.TO) and Powell Industries, Inc. (POWL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CCO.TO | POWL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.61 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.12 | 12.34 | -10.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.02 | 38.68 | -33.65 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CCO.TO vs. POWL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CCO.TO drawdown since its inception was -83.63%, which is greater than POWL's maximum drawdown of -66.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCO.TO and POWL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CCO.TO | POWL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.63% | -66.46% | -17.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.09% | -30.12% | +3.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.52% | -53.91% | +14.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.52% | -53.91% | +14.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.84% | -66.46% | +13.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.37% | -6.51% | -15.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -48.40% | -27.88% | -20.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.38% | 9.60% | +1.78% |
Volatility
CCO.TO vs. POWL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cameco Corporation (CCO.TO) is 17.67%, while Powell Industries, Inc. (POWL) has a volatility of 19.92%. This indicates that CCO.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than POWL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CCO.TO | POWL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.67% | 19.92% | -2.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.63% | 44.73% | -6.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 53.97% | 59.83% | -5.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 48.05% | 64.86% | -16.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.10% | 55.22% | -10.12% |
Dividends
CCO.TO vs. POWL - Dividend Comparison
CCO.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, more than POWL's 0.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCO.TO Cameco Corporation | 0.17% | 0.19% | 0.22% | 0.21% | 0.39% | 0.29% | 0.47% | 0.69% | 0.52% | 3.45% | 2.85% | 2.34% |
POWL Powell Industries, Inc. | 0.12% | 0.34% | 0.48% | 1.19% | 2.96% | 3.53% | 3.53% | 2.12% | 4.16% | 3.63% | 2.67% | 4.00% |
Financials
CCO.TO vs. POWL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cameco Corporation and Powell Industries, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CCO.TO vs. POWL - Profitability Comparison
CCO.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cameco Corporation reported a gross profit of 290.25M and revenue of 845.37M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.3%.
POWL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Powell Industries, Inc. reported a gross profit of 87.94M and revenue of 296.62M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 29.7%.
CCO.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cameco Corporation reported an operating income of 153.89M and revenue of 845.37M, resulting in an operating margin of 18.2%.
POWL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Powell Industries, Inc. reported an operating income of 57.58M and revenue of 296.62M, resulting in an operating margin of 19.4%.
CCO.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cameco Corporation reported a net income of 130.75M and revenue of 845.37M, resulting in a net margin of 15.5%.
POWL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Powell Industries, Inc. reported a net income of 45.89M and revenue of 296.62M, resulting in a net margin of 15.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CCO.TO and POWL have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for CCO.TO and POWL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer