PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CCLAX vs. CISIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CCLAX vs. CISIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calvert Conservative Allocation Fund (CCLAX) and Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index Fund (CISIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCLAX achieves a 4.31% return, which is significantly lower than CISIX's 12.83% return. Over the past 10 years, CCLAX has underperformed CISIX with an annualized return of 5.68%, while CISIX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.61% annualized return.


CCLAX

1D
0.20%
1M
2.03%
YTD
4.31%
6M
4.80%
1Y
12.02%
3Y*
8.91%
5Y*
3.64%
10Y*
5.68%

CISIX

1D
0.49%
1M
5.77%
YTD
12.83%
6M
13.06%
1Y
30.78%
3Y*
22.38%
5Y*
12.97%
10Y*
15.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCLAX vs. CISIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CCLAX
Calvert Conservative Allocation Fund
4.31%10.23%6.39%10.07%-14.32%7.73%12.18%15.62%-2.96%8.28%
CISIX
Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index Fund
12.83%15.90%24.14%27.27%-21.68%25.63%26.12%32.81%-4.08%21.18%

Correlation

The correlation between CCLAX and CISIX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2005

0.84

The correlation between CCLAX and CISIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CCLAX vs. CISIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCLAX
CCLAX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
CCLAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCLAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCLAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
CCLAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCLAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

CISIX
CISIX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
CISIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CISIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
CISIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
CISIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
CISIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCLAX vs. CISIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert Conservative Allocation Fund (CCLAX) and Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index Fund (CISIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CCLAXCISIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.11

2.50

-0.39

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.10

3.43

-0.32

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.44

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.40

3.19

-0.79

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.75

14.73

-3.98

CCLAX vs. CISIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCLAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is comparable to the CISIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCLAX and CISIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CCLAXCISIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.11

2.50

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.73

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

0.84

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

0.39

+0.45

Drawdowns

CCLAX vs. CISIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCLAX drawdown since its inception was -23.98%, smaller than the maximum CISIX drawdown of -59.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCLAX and CISIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CCLAXCISIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.98%

-59.36%

+35.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.02%

-9.72%

+4.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.90%

-19.94%

+12.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.86%

-27.37%

+8.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.86%

-32.82%

+13.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.85%

-14.29%

+11.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.12%

2.11%

-0.99%

Volatility

CCLAX vs. CISIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Calvert Conservative Allocation Fund (CCLAX) is 2.20%, while Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index Fund (CISIX) has a volatility of 3.33%. This indicates that CCLAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CISIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CCLAXCISIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.20%

3.33%

-1.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.75%

9.67%

-4.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.73%

12.53%

-6.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.13%

17.78%

-10.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.75%

18.57%

-11.82%

CCLAX vs. CISIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CCLAX has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is higher than CISIX's 0.24% expense ratio.


Dividends

CCLAX vs. CISIX - Dividend Comparison

CCLAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.14%, less than CISIX's 4.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CCLAX
Calvert Conservative Allocation Fund
3.14%3.31%3.37%3.24%2.22%5.37%4.16%4.14%4.83%2.22%3.52%5.82%
CISIX
Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index Fund
4.78%5.39%1.77%1.02%1.17%1.02%0.94%1.14%4.33%2.41%3.77%7.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


CCLAX and CISIX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CISIX has higher volatility (3.33%) compared to CCLAX (2.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCLAX dropped -23.98% vs CISIX's -59.36%.

CISIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CCLAX and CISIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer