CCL vs. VRM
CCL (Carnival Corporation & Plc) and VRM (Vroom, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Cyclical sector — CCL in Travel Services, VRM in Auto & Truck Dealerships. Over the past 5 years, CCL returned -0.29%/yr vs -71.03%/yr for VRM. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CCL vs. VRM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CCL achieves a -3.42% return, which is significantly higher than VRM's -63.68% return.
CCL
- 1D
- 3.77%
- 1M
- 19.15%
- YTD
- -3.42%
- 6M
- 6.79%
- 1Y
- 31.61%
- 3Y*
- 24.35%
- 5Y*
- -0.29%
- 10Y*
- -3.28%
VRM
- 1D
- -8.03%
- 1M
- -35.42%
- YTD
- -63.68%
- 6M
- -72.42%
- 1Y
- -73.36%
- 3Y*
- -57.91%
- 5Y*
- -71.03%
- 10Y*
- —
CCL vs. VRM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCL Carnival Corporation & Plc | -3.42% | 22.55% | 34.41% | 130.02% | -59.94% | -7.11% | -13.05% |
VRM Vroom, Inc. | -63.68% | 296.81% | -89.61% | -40.93% | -90.55% | -73.66% | 1.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between CCL and VRM is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2020 | 0.30 |
The correlation between CCL and VRM shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (3 years) to 0.34 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CCL:
$2.21
VRM:
-$12.02
CCL:
1.51
VRM:
0.56
CCL:
$26.98B
VRM:
$50.29M
CCL:
$10.13B
VRM:
$24.05M
CCL:
$7.23B
VRM:
-$2.99M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CCL vs. VRM — Risk / Return Rank
CCL
VRM
CCL vs. VRM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Carnival Corporation & Plc (CCL) and Vroom, Inc. (VRM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CCL | VRM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 0.83 | +0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.86 | -0.94 | +1.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.73 | -1.79 | +3.52 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CCL vs. VRM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CCL drawdown since its inception was -90.37%, smaller than the maximum VRM drawdown of -99.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCL and VRM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CCL | VRM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.37% | -99.93% | +9.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.30% | -77.99% | +48.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.85% | -98.01% | +55.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -78.21% | -99.88% | +21.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -90.37% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -55.46% | -99.88% | +44.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.58% | -84.17% | +55.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.54% | 41.01% | -26.47% |
Volatility
CCL vs. VRM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Carnival Corporation & Plc (CCL) is 16.53%, while Vroom, Inc. (VRM) has a volatility of 26.47%. This indicates that CCL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VRM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CCL | VRM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.53% | 26.47% | -9.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.11% | 73.49% | -34.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.77% | 88.66% | -40.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.59% | 261.66% | -206.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 57.65% | 239.80% | -182.15% |
Dividends
CCL vs. VRM - Dividend Comparison
CCL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, while VRM has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCL Carnival Corporation & Plc | 1.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.31% | 3.93% | 3.96% | 2.41% | 2.59% | 2.02% |
VRM Vroom, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
CCL vs. VRM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Carnival Corporation & Plc and Vroom, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
CCL and VRM have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VRM has higher volatility (26.47%) compared to CCL (16.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCL dropped -90.37% vs VRM's -99.93%.
CCL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.53 vs -0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CCL and VRM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer