CCL vs. BABA
CCL (Carnival Corporation & Plc) and BABA (Alibaba Group Holding Limited) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Cyclical sector — CCL in Travel Services, BABA in Internet Retail. Over the past 10 years, CCL returned -3.28%/yr vs 4.42%/yr for BABA. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CCL vs. BABA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CCL achieves a -3.42% return, which is significantly higher than BABA's -22.32% return. Over the past 10 years, CCL has underperformed BABA with an annualized return of -3.28%, while BABA has yielded a comparatively higher 4.42% annualized return.
CCL
- 1D
- 3.77%
- 1M
- 19.15%
- YTD
- -3.42%
- 6M
- 6.79%
- 1Y
- 31.61%
- 3Y*
- 24.35%
- 5Y*
- -0.29%
- 10Y*
- -3.28%
BABA
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -14.13%
- YTD
- -22.32%
- 6M
- -26.87%
- 1Y
- 0.87%
- 3Y*
- 11.06%
- 5Y*
- -10.74%
- 10Y*
- 4.42%
CCL vs. BABA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCL Carnival Corporation & Plc | -3.42% | 22.55% | 34.41% | 130.02% | -59.94% | -7.11% | -56.89% | 7.37% | -23.40% | 30.76% |
BABA Alibaba Group Holding Limited | -22.32% | 75.80% | 11.77% | -10.83% | -25.84% | -48.96% | 9.73% | 54.74% | -20.51% | 96.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between CCL and BABA is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2014 | 0.28 |
Fundamentals
CCL:
$40.62B
BABA:
$272.45B
CCL:
$2.21
BABA:
CN¥33.90
CCL:
13.18
BABA:
22.55
CCL:
1.51
BABA:
2.26
CCL:
3.12
BABA:
1.75
CCL:
$26.98B
BABA:
CN¥811.51B
CCL:
$10.13B
BABA:
CN¥332.88B
CCL:
$7.23B
BABA:
CN¥112.44B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CCL vs. BABA — Risk / Return Rank
CCL
BABA
CCL vs. BABA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Carnival Corporation & Plc (CCL) and Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CCL | BABA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.03 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.86 | -0.06 | +0.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.73 | -0.12 | +1.86 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CCL vs. BABA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CCL drawdown since its inception was -90.37%, which is greater than BABA's maximum drawdown of -80.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCL and BABA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CCL | BABA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.37% | -80.09% | -10.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.30% | -39.94% | +10.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.85% | -39.94% | -2.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -78.21% | -72.48% | -5.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -90.37% | -80.09% | -10.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -55.46% | -62.20% | +6.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.58% | -37.56% | +8.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.54% | 19.58% | -5.04% |
Volatility
CCL vs. BABA - Volatility Comparison
Carnival Corporation & Plc (CCL) has a higher volatility of 16.53% compared to Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) at 10.07%. This indicates that CCL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BABA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CCL | BABA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.53% | 10.07% | +6.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.11% | 29.24% | +9.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.77% | 43.83% | +3.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.59% | 51.40% | +4.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 57.65% | 43.40% | +14.25% |
Dividends
CCL vs. BABA - Dividend Comparison
CCL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, more than BABA's 0.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BABA Alibaba Group Holding Limited | 0.93% | 1.36% | 1.96% | 1.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CCL Carnival Corporation & Plc | 1.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.31% | 3.93% | 3.96% | 2.41% | 2.59% | 2.02% |
Financials
CCL vs. BABA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Carnival Corporation & Plc and Alibaba Group Holding Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CCL vs. BABA - Profitability Comparison
CCL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Carnival Corporation & Plc reported a gross profit of 2.23B and revenue of 6.17B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.1%.
BABA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alibaba Group Holding Limited reported a gross profit of 11.75B and revenue of 35.15B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.4%.
CCL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Carnival Corporation & Plc reported an operating income of 607.00M and revenue of 6.17B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.9%.
BABA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alibaba Group Holding Limited reported an operating income of -135.47M and revenue of 35.15B, resulting in an operating margin of -0.4%.
CCL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Carnival Corporation & Plc reported a net income of 258.00M and revenue of 6.17B, resulting in a net margin of 4.2%.
BABA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alibaba Group Holding Limited reported a net income of 3.69B and revenue of 35.15B, resulting in a net margin of 10.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CCL and BABA have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CCL has higher volatility (16.53%) compared to BABA (10.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCL dropped -90.37% vs BABA's -80.09%.
CCL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.53 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CCL and BABA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer