PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CCK vs. CNH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CCK vs. CNH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Crown Holdings, Inc. (CCK) and CNH Industrial NV (CNH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCK achieves a 3.08% return, which is significantly lower than CNH's 9.40% return. Over the past 10 years, CCK has outperformed CNH with an annualized return of 8.41%, while CNH has yielded a comparatively lower 5.49% annualized return.


CCK

1D
2.13%
1M
9.01%
YTD
3.08%
6M
2.98%
1Y
2.43%
3Y*
8.39%
5Y*
2.08%
10Y*
8.41%

CNH

1D
-3.76%
1M
-1.19%
YTD
9.40%
6M
7.76%
1Y
-20.77%
3Y*
-7.97%
5Y*
-7.47%
10Y*
5.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCK vs. CNH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CCK
Crown Holdings, Inc.
3.08%25.87%-9.13%13.29%-24.99%11.26%38.13%74.50%-26.10%7.00%
CNH
CNH Industrial NV
9.40%-17.10%-3.12%-22.01%-15.74%52.59%16.73%21.64%-30.31%57.67%

Correlation

The correlation between CCK and CNH is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2013

0.41

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CCK:

$11.86B

CNH:

$12.43B

EPS

CCK:

$6.28

CNH:

$0.32

PE Ratio

CCK:

16.80

CNH:

31.52

PS Ratio

CCK:

0.95

CNH:

0.69

PB Ratio

CCK:

3.48

CNH:

1.58

Total Revenue (TTM)

CCK:

$12.74B

CNH:

$18.09B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CCK:

$2.29B

CNH:

$4.45B

EBITDA (TTM)

CCK:

$2.06B

CNH:

$2.09B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CCK vs. CNH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCK
CCK Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
CCK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCK Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCK Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
CCK Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCK Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

CNH
CNH Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
CNH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNH Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNH Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
CNH Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNH Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCK vs. CNH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Crown Holdings, Inc. (CCK) and CNH Industrial NV (CNH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CCKCNHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

0.92

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.12

-0.63

+0.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.25

-0.97

+1.22

CCK vs. CNH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCK Sharpe Ratio is 0.10, which is higher than the CNH Sharpe Ratio of -0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCK and CNH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CCK vs. CNH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCK drawdown since its inception was -98.20%, which is greater than CNH's maximum drawdown of -65.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCK and CNH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CCKCNHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.20%

-65.82%

-32.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.19%

-33.19%

+13.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.73%

-37.66%

+12.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.28%

-47.76%

-0.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.28%

-65.82%

+17.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.69%

-42.85%

+28.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.19%

-28.62%

-0.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.82%

21.39%

-11.57%

Volatility

CCK vs. CNH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Crown Holdings, Inc. (CCK) is 7.10%, while CNH Industrial NV (CNH) has a volatility of 14.78%. This indicates that CCK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CCKCNHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.10%

14.78%

-7.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.63%

29.01%

-10.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.81%

35.97%

-11.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.90%

35.85%

-6.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.34%

36.50%

-7.16%

Dividends

CCK vs. CNH - Dividend Comparison

CCK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, more than CNH's 1.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CCK
Crown Holdings, Inc.
1.16%1.01%1.21%1.04%1.07%0.72%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CNH
CNH Industrial NV
1.00%2.71%4.15%3.25%1.88%0.68%0.00%1.85%1.87%1.64%1.50%2.92%

Financials

CCK vs. CNH - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Crown Holdings, Inc. and CNH Industrial NV. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B7.00B8.00B9.00B20222023202420252026
3.26B
3.83B
(CCK) Total Revenue
(CNH) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CCK vs. CNH - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Crown Holdings, Inc. and CNH Industrial NV over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%20222023202420252026
19.8%
0
Portfolio components
CCK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Crown Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 644.00M and revenue of 3.26B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.8%.

CNH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CNH Industrial NV reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 3.83B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

CCK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Crown Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 365.00M and revenue of 3.26B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.2%.

CNH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CNH Industrial NV reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 3.83B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

CCK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Crown Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 175.00M and revenue of 3.26B, resulting in a net margin of 5.4%.

CNH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CNH Industrial NV reported a net income of 17.00M and revenue of 3.83B, resulting in a net margin of 0.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CCK and CNH have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CNH has higher volatility (14.78%) compared to CCK (7.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCK dropped -98.20% vs CNH's -65.82%.

CCK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.10 vs -0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CCK and CNH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer