CCK vs. TQQQ

In the year-to-date period, CCK achieves a -1.60% return, which is significantly lower than TQQQ's 54.08% return. Over the past 10 years, CCK has underperformed TQQQ with an annualized return of 6.71%, while TQQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 34.59% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Crown Holdings, Inc. (CCK) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current CCK Sharpe Ratio is 0.34, which is lower than the TQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCK and TQQQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

CCK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, less than TQQQ's 1.23% yield.

The maximum CCK drawdown since its inception was -98.20%, which is greater than TQQQ's maximum drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCK and TQQQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Crown Holdings, Inc. (CCK) is 4.69%, while ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a volatility of 17.03%. This indicates that CCK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.