CCK vs. TQQQ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CCK (Crown Holdings, Inc.) is a stock, while TQQQ (ProShares UltraPro QQQ) is Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). Over the past 10 years, CCK returned 6.52%/yr vs 45.33%/yr for TQQQ. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CCK vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Crown Holdings, Inc. (CCK) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCK achieves a -7.60% return, which is significantly lower than TQQQ's 64.46% return. Over the past 10 years, CCK has underperformed TQQQ with an annualized return of 6.52%, while TQQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 45.33% annualized return.

CCK

• 1D: -1.30%
• 1M: -4.26%
• YTD: -7.60%
• 6M: -4.28%
• 1Y: -2.60%
• 3Y*: 6.79%
• 5Y*: -0.14%
• 10Y*: 6.52%

TQQQ

• 1D: -0.76%
• 1M: 33.35%
• YTD: 64.46%
• 6M: 55.93%
• 1Y: 137.89%
• 3Y*: 69.49%
• 5Y*: 28.37%
• 10Y*: 45.33%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCK vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CCK Crown Holdings, Inc.	-7.60%	25.87%	-9.13%	13.29%	-24.99%	11.26%	38.13%	74.50%	-26.10%	7.00%
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ	64.46%	34.35%	58.27%	198.04%	-79.09%	82.98%	110.05%	133.84%	-19.79%	118.06%

Correlation

The correlation between CCK and TQQQ is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.14
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.22
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.34
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.38
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2010	0.43

Over the past year, the correlation between CCK and TQQQ has dropped to 0.14 - well below their long-term average of 0.43, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

CCK vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCK

CCK Risk / Return Rank: 34
CCK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
CCK Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
CCK Omega Ratio Rank: 30
CCK Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
CCK Martin Ratio Rank: 35

TQQQ

TQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 71
TQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
TQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
TQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 65
TQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
TQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCK vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Crown Holdings, Inc. (CCK) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CCK	TQQQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.11	2.92	-3.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.02	3.09	-3.07
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.00	1.40	-0.40
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.14	3.75	-3.90
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.28	12.27	-12.55
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CCK vs. TQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCK Sharpe Ratio is -0.11, which is lower than the TQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCK and TQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CCK	TQQQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.11	2.92	-3.02
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.00	0.43	-0.43
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.22	0.69	-0.47
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.07	0.74	-0.66

Drawdowns

CCK vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCK drawdown since its inception was -98.20%, which is greater than TQQQ's maximum drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCK and TQQQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	CCK	TQQQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.20%	-81.66%	-16.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.06%	-36.97%	+18.91%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.73%	-58.04%	+33.31%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-48.28%	-81.66%	+33.38%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-48.28%	-81.66%	+33.38%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-23.52%	-0.76%	-22.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-29.21%	-18.52%	-10.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.21%	11.28%	-2.07%

Volatility

CCK vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Crown Holdings, Inc. (CCK) is 6.47%, while ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a volatility of 13.29%. This indicates that CCK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CCK	TQQQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.47%	13.29%	-6.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.60%	36.04%	-17.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.38%	47.60%	-23.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.80%	66.53%	-37.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.36%	65.96%	-36.60%

Dividends

CCK vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison

CCK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%, more than TQQQ's 0.36% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CCK Crown Holdings, Inc.	1.29%	1.01%	1.21%	1.04%	1.07%	0.72%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ	0.36%	0.65%	1.27%	1.26%	0.57%	0.00%	0.00%	0.06%	0.11%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CCK and TQQQ in my portfolio?

CCK and TQQQ have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CCK or TQQQ?

TQQQ has higher volatility (13.29%) compared to CCK (6.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCK dropped -98.20% vs TQQQ's -81.66%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.