CCK vs. SLGN

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Crown Holdings, Inc. (CCK) and Silgan Holdings Inc. (SLGN).

Performance

CCK vs. SLGN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Crown Holdings, Inc. (CCK) and Silgan Holdings Inc. (SLGN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CCK vs. SLGN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CCK Crown Holdings, Inc.	1.16%	25.87%	-9.13%	13.29%	-24.99%	11.26%	38.13%	74.50%	-26.10%	7.00%
SLGN Silgan Holdings Inc.	-0.87%	-21.11%	16.80%	-11.33%	22.68%	17.06%	21.06%	33.55%	-18.44%	16.08%

Fundamentals

EPS CCK : $6.40 SLGN : $2.95
PE Ratio CCK : 16.23 SLGN : 13.52
PS Ratio CCK : 0.97 SLGN : 0.66
Total Revenue (TTM) CCK : $12.37B SLGN : $6.43B
Gross Profit (TTM) CCK : $2.27B SLGN : $1.14B
EBITDA (TTM) CCK : $2.01B SLGN : $905.40M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCK achieves a 1.16% return, which is significantly higher than SLGN's -0.87% return. Over the past 10 years, CCK has outperformed SLGN with an annualized return of 8.25%, while SLGN has yielded a comparatively lower 5.62% annualized return.

CCK

• 1D: 3.56%
• 1M: -10.29%
• YTD: 1.16%
• 6M: 7.96%
• 1Y: 16.39%
• 3Y*: 9.12%
• 5Y*: 1.73%
• 10Y*: 8.25%

SLGN

• 1D: 2.63%
• 1M: -17.54%
• YTD: -0.87%
• 6M: -6.61%
• 1Y: -20.97%
• 3Y*: -7.97%
• 5Y*: 0.47%
• 10Y*: 5.62%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CCK vs. SLGN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCK

CCK Risk / Return Rank: 60
CCK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
CCK Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
CCK Omega Ratio Rank: 55
CCK Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
CCK Martin Ratio Rank: 63

SLGN

SLGN Risk / Return Rank: 17
SLGN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
SLGN Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
SLGN Omega Ratio Rank: 13
SLGN Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
SLGN Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCK vs. SLGN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Crown Holdings, Inc. (CCK) and Silgan Holdings Inc. (SLGN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CCK	SLGN	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.63	-0.65	+1.27
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.08	-0.69	+1.77
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	0.89	+0.24
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.08	-0.62	+1.69
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.32	-1.02	+3.34
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CCK vs. SLGN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCK Sharpe Ratio is 0.63, which is higher than the SLGN Sharpe Ratio of -0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCK and SLGN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CCK	SLGN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.63	-0.65	+1.27
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.06	0.02	+0.04
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.28	0.24	+0.04
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.08	0.31	-0.23

Correlation

The correlation between CCK and SLGN is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

CCK vs. SLGN - Dividend Comparison

CCK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, less than SLGN's 2.03% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CCK Crown Holdings, Inc.	1.09%	1.01%	1.21%	1.04%	1.07%	0.72%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SLGN Silgan Holdings Inc.	2.03%	1.98%	1.46%	1.59%	1.23%	1.31%	1.29%	1.42%	1.69%	1.22%	1.33%	1.19%

Drawdowns

CCK vs. SLGN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCK drawdown since its inception was -98.20%, which is greater than SLGN's maximum drawdown of -86.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCK and SLGN.

Drawdown Indicators

	CCK	SLGN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.20%	-86.14%	-12.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.35%	-33.54%	+17.19%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-48.28%	-33.71%	-14.57%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-48.28%	-33.71%	-14.57%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-16.27%	-29.01%	+12.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-29.25%	-16.54%	-12.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.59%	20.25%	-12.66%

Volatility

CCK vs. SLGN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Crown Holdings, Inc. (CCK) is 8.54%, while Silgan Holdings Inc. (SLGN) has a volatility of 9.45%. This indicates that CCK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLGN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CCK	SLGN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.54%	9.45%	-0.91%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.34%	23.71%	-5.37%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.31%	32.60%	-6.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.73%	25.31%	+3.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.23%	23.66%	+5.57%

Financials

CCK vs. SLGN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Crown Holdings, Inc. and Silgan Holdings Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

CCK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Crown Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 322.00M and revenue of 3.13B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.3%.

SLGN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Silgan Holdings Inc. reported a gross profit of 327.30M and revenue of 2.01B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 16.3%.

CCK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Crown Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 427.00M and revenue of 3.13B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.7%.

SLGN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Silgan Holdings Inc. reported an operating income of 205.10M and revenue of 2.01B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.2%.

CCK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Crown Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 149.00M and revenue of 3.13B, resulting in a net margin of 4.8%.

SLGN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Silgan Holdings Inc. reported a net income of 113.30M and revenue of 2.01B, resulting in a net margin of 5.6%.