PortfoliosLab logo
CCK vs. SLGN
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CCK and SLGN is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

CCK vs. SLGN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Crown Holdings, Inc. (CCK) and Silgan Holdings Inc. (SLGN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CCK:

0.78

SLGN:

0.79

Sortino Ratio

CCK:

1.39

SLGN:

1.24

Omega Ratio

CCK:

1.17

SLGN:

1.15

Calmar Ratio

CCK:

0.46

SLGN:

0.75

Martin Ratio

CCK:

2.37

SLGN:

2.47

Ulcer Index

CCK:

8.35%

SLGN:

7.11%

Daily Std Dev

CCK:

25.38%

SLGN:

23.32%

Max Drawdown

CCK:

-98.20%

SLGN:

-86.14%

Current Drawdown

CCK:

-20.59%

SLGN:

-3.90%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CCK:

$11.61B

SLGN:

$5.82B

EPS

CCK:

$4.64

SLGN:

$2.69

PE Ratio

CCK:

21.49

SLGN:

20.22

PEG Ratio

CCK:

0.84

SLGN:

1.09

PS Ratio

CCK:

0.97

SLGN:

0.97

PB Ratio

CCK:

4.21

SLGN:

2.79

Total Revenue (TTM)

CCK:

$11.92B

SLGN:

$6.00B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CCK:

$2.29B

SLGN:

$1.06B

EBITDA (TTM)

CCK:

$1.73B

SLGN:

$870.05M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCK achieves a 20.77% return, which is significantly higher than SLGN's 5.86% return. Over the past 10 years, CCK has underperformed SLGN with an annualized return of 6.28%, while SLGN has yielded a comparatively higher 8.22% annualized return.


CCK

YTD

20.77%

1M

17.44%

6M

10.89%

1Y

19.62%

5Y*

11.90%

10Y*

6.28%

SLGN

YTD

5.86%

1M

11.98%

6M

2.51%

1Y

18.26%

5Y*

12.48%

10Y*

8.22%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CCK vs. SLGN — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCK
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CCK is 7474
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CCK is 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CCK is 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CCK is 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CCK is 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CCK is 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

SLGN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SLGN is 7575
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SLGN is 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SLGN is 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SLGN is 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SLGN is 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SLGN is 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CCK vs. SLGN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Crown Holdings, Inc. (CCK) and Silgan Holdings Inc. (SLGN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CCK Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is comparable to the SLGN Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCK and SLGN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

CCK vs. SLGN - Dividend Comparison

CCK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than SLGN's 1.40% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CCK
Crown Holdings, Inc.
1.01%1.21%1.04%1.07%0.72%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SLGN
Silgan Holdings Inc.
1.40%1.46%1.59%1.23%1.31%1.29%1.42%1.69%0.92%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

CCK vs. SLGN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCK drawdown since its inception was -98.20%, which is greater than SLGN's maximum drawdown of -86.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCK and SLGN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

CCK vs. SLGN - Volatility Comparison

Crown Holdings, Inc. (CCK) has a higher volatility of 9.07% compared to Silgan Holdings Inc. (SLGN) at 6.94%. This indicates that CCK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLGN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

CCK vs. SLGN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Crown Holdings, Inc. and Silgan Holdings Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B3.50B20212022202320242025
2.89B
1.47B
(CCK) Total Revenue
(SLGN) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CCK vs. SLGN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Crown Holdings, Inc. and Silgan Holdings Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

14.0%16.0%18.0%20.0%22.0%20212022202320242025
17.8%
18.4%
(CCK) Gross Margin
(SLGN) Gross Margin
CCK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Crown Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 515.00M and revenue of 2.89B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 17.8%.

SLGN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Silgan Holdings Inc. reported a gross profit of 270.40M and revenue of 1.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 18.4%.

CCK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Crown Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 365.00M and revenue of 2.89B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.6%.

SLGN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Silgan Holdings Inc. reported an operating income of 141.50M and revenue of 1.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.7%.

CCK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Crown Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 193.00M and revenue of 2.89B, resulting in a net margin of 6.7%.

SLGN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Silgan Holdings Inc. reported a net income of 67.96M and revenue of 1.47B, resulting in a net margin of 4.6%.