CCH.L vs. K.TO
CCH.L (Coca Cola HBC AG) and K.TO (Kinross Gold Corporation) are both stocks. CCH.L operates in Beverages - Non-Alcoholic (Consumer Defensive), while K.TO operates in Gold (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, CCH.L returned 16.35%/yr vs 19.30%/yr for K.TO. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CCH.L vs. K.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CCH.L is traded in GBp, while K.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the K.TO values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CCH.L achieves a 22.34% return, which is significantly higher than K.TO's -8.64% return. Over the past 10 years, CCH.L has underperformed K.TO with an annualized return of 16.35%, while K.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 19.30% annualized return.
CCH.L
- 1D
- 1.28%
- 1M
- 9.92%
- YTD
- 22.34%
- 6M
- 27.17%
- 1Y
- 19.11%
- 3Y*
- 28.32%
- 5Y*
- 15.57%
- 10Y*
- 16.35%
K.TO
- 1D
- 3.04%
- 1M
- -17.20%
- YTD
- -8.64%
- 6M
- -8.32%
- 1Y
- 65.08%
- 3Y*
- 72.91%
- 5Y*
- 30.14%
- 10Y*
- 19.30%
CCH.L vs. K.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCH.L Coca Cola HBC AG | 22.34% | 43.91% | 22.14% | 20.08% | -19.68% | 10.15% | -4.69% | 11.09% | 3.27% | 39.03% |
K.TO Kinross Gold Corporation | -8.64% | 183.98% | 58.61% | 45.14% | -18.72% | -19.45% | 51.90% | 40.46% | -20.67% | 26.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between CCH.L and K.TO is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2013 | 0.02 |
The correlation between CCH.L and K.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (all time) to 0.14 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CCH.L:
£16.70B
K.TO:
CA$43.06B
CCH.L:
€4.84
K.TO:
$2.36
CCH.L:
10.98
K.TO:
10.83
CCH.L:
0.61
K.TO:
0.14
CCH.L:
0.86
K.TO:
3.90
CCH.L:
5.03
K.TO:
3.39
CCH.L:
€22.35B
K.TO:
$7.97B
CCH.L:
€8.14B
K.TO:
$4.26B
CCH.L:
€3.00B
K.TO:
$5.03B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CCH.L vs. K.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CCH.L
K.TO
CCH.L vs. K.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Coca Cola HBC AG (CCH.L) and Kinross Gold Corporation (K.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CCH.L | K.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.25 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.03 | 1.92 | -0.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.15 | 5.99 | -3.84 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CCH.L vs. K.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CCH.L drawdown since its inception was -48.45%, smaller than the maximum K.TO drawdown of -93.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCH.L and K.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CCH.L | K.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.45% | -93.35% | +44.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.05% | -36.01% | +17.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.05% | -36.01% | +17.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.54% | -51.98% | +4.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.45% | -65.45% | +17.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.09% | -30.89% | +27.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.55% | -56.34% | +41.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.69% | 11.53% | -2.84% |
Volatility
CCH.L vs. K.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Coca Cola HBC AG (CCH.L) is 5.17%, while Kinross Gold Corporation (K.TO) has a volatility of 17.48%. This indicates that CCH.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than K.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CCH.L | K.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.17% | 17.48% | -12.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.79% | 37.73% | -20.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.83% | 49.77% | -26.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.89% | 40.87% | -16.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.20% | 44.99% | -18.79% |
Dividends
CCH.L vs. K.TO - Dividend Comparison
CCH.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.26%, more than K.TO's 0.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCH.L Coca Cola HBC AG | 2.26% | 2.33% | 2.96% | 2.94% | 3.60% | 2.50% | 2.35% | 6.99% | 1.95% | 1.60% | 1.88% | 1.76% |
K.TO Kinross Gold Corporation | 0.56% | 0.45% | 1.23% | 2.04% | 2.68% | 1.63% | 0.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
CCH.L vs. K.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Coca Cola HBC AG and Kinross Gold Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CCH.L vs. K.TO - Profitability Comparison
CCH.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Coca Cola HBC AG reported a gross profit of 2.20B and revenue of 5.98B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.8%.
K.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kinross Gold Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.44B and revenue of 2.41B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.9%.
CCH.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Coca Cola HBC AG reported an operating income of 654.01M and revenue of 5.98B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.9%.
K.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kinross Gold Corporation reported an operating income of 1.33B and revenue of 2.41B, resulting in an operating margin of 55.1%.
CCH.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Coca Cola HBC AG reported a net income of 469.16M and revenue of 5.98B, resulting in a net margin of 7.9%.
K.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kinross Gold Corporation reported a net income of 843.00M and revenue of 2.41B, resulting in a net margin of 35.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CCH.L and K.TO have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for CCH.L and K.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer