PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CCBI.TO vs. XCB.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CCBI.TO vs. XCB.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CIBC Canadian Bond Index ETF (CCBI.TO) and iShares Core Canadian Corporate Bond Index ETF (XCB.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCBI.TO achieves a 0.83% return, which is significantly lower than XCB.TO's 1.09% return.


CCBI.TO

1D
-0.11%
1M
-1.48%
6M
0.27%
YTD
0.83%
1Y
3.73%
3Y*
4.09%
5Y*
-0.50%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
0.75%

XCB.TO

1D
0.30%
1M
-0.99%
6M
0.49%
YTD
1.09%
1Y
3.96%
3Y*
6.22%
5Y*
1.91%
10Y*
2.61%
ALL TIME*
3.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CA$275.96KCA$286.08KCA$301.22K
CA$3.39MCA$3.61MCA$3.84M

CCBI.TO vs. XCB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CCBI.TO
CIBC Canadian Bond Index ETF
0.83%2.17%4.26%4.11%-9.05%2.30%
XCB.TO
iShares Core Canadian Corporate Bond Index ETF
1.09%4.45%6.72%8.30%-9.79%2.24%

Correlation

The correlation between CCBI.TO and XCB.TO is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2021

0.53

Over the past year, CCBI.TO and XCB.TO have become more correlated (0.76) than their long-term average of 0.53, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CCBI.TO vs. XCB.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCBI.TO
CCBI.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
CCBI.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCBI.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCBI.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
CCBI.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCBI.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

XCB.TO
XCB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
XCB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
XCB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCBI.TO vs. XCB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CIBC Canadian Bond Index ETF (CCBI.TO) and iShares Core Canadian Corporate Bond Index ETF (XCB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CCBI.TOXCB.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.19

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.36

1.59

-0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.35

4.68

-1.32

CCBI.TO vs. XCB.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCBI.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is comparable to the XCB.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCBI.TO and XCB.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CCBI.TO vs. XCB.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCBI.TO drawdown since its inception was -17.72%, smaller than the maximum XCB.TO drawdown of -22.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCBI.TO and XCB.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CCBI.TOXCB.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.72%

-22.59%

+4.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.72%

-2.49%

-0.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.34%

-3.27%

-1.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.72%

-14.17%

-3.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.64%

-1.04%

-1.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.90%

-2.10%

-5.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.10%

0.85%

+0.25%

Volatility

CCBI.TO vs. XCB.TO - Volatility Comparison

CIBC Canadian Bond Index ETF (CCBI.TO) has a higher volatility of 1.15% compared to iShares Core Canadian Corporate Bond Index ETF (XCB.TO) at 1.05%. This indicates that CCBI.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XCB.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CCBI.TOXCB.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.15%

1.05%

+0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.34%

3.10%

+0.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.20%

3.82%

+0.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.82%

5.68%

+1.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.97%

7.23%

-0.26%

CCBI.TO vs. XCB.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CCBI.TO has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than XCB.TO's 0.17% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CCBI.TO vs. XCB.TO - Dividend Comparison

CCBI.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.36%, less than XCB.TO's 4.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CCBI.TO
CIBC Canadian Bond Index ETF
3.36%3.22%2.85%2.78%2.60%1.78%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XCB.TO
iShares Core Canadian Corporate Bond Index ETF
4.18%4.10%4.00%3.69%3.55%3.01%2.75%2.95%3.10%3.07%3.19%3.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


CCBI.TO and XCB.TO have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CCBI.TO is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CCBI.TO is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for XCB.TO.

CCBI.TO is categorized as Total Bond Market, while XCB.TO is Corporate Bonds. CCBI.TO tracks FTSE Canada Universe Bond Index, while XCB.TO tracks FTSE Canada All Corporate Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: CIBC Asset Management Inc. and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for CCBI.TO and 0.17% for XCB.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CCBI.TO and XCB.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer