CCBI.TO vs. HBB.TO

Last updated Jul 25, 2026

CCBI.TO (CIBC Canadian Bond Index ETF) and HBB.TO (Global X Canadian Select Universe Bond Index Corporate Class ETF) are both Total Bond Market funds - CCBI.TO tracks the FTSE Canada Universe Bond Index while HBB.TO tracks the Solactive Canadian Select Universe Bond. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CCBI.TO returned -0.50%/yr vs -0.13%/yr for HBB.TO. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CCBI.TO charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for HBB.TO.

Performance

CCBI.TO vs. HBB.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CIBC Canadian Bond Index ETF (CCBI.TO) and Global X Canadian Select Universe Bond Index Corporate Class ETF (HBB.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCBI.TO achieves a 0.83% return, which is significantly higher than HBB.TO's 0.62% return.

CCBI.TO

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: -1.48%
• 6M: 0.27%
• YTD: 0.83%
• 1Y: 3.73%
• 3Y*: 4.09%
• 5Y*: -0.50%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 0.75%

HBB.TO

• 1D: 0.30%
• 1M: -1.37%
• 6M: 0.16%
• YTD: 0.62%
• 1Y: 3.23%
• 3Y*: 3.86%
• 5Y*: -0.13%
• 10Y*: 1.13%
• ALL TIME*: 1.88%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CCBI.TO CIBC Canadian Bond Index ETF	CA$275.96K	CA$286.08K	CA$301.22K
HBB.TO Global X Canadian Select Universe Bond Index Corporate Class ETF	CA$841.05K	CA$1.06M	CA$1.05M

CCBI.TO vs. HBB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CCBI.TO CIBC Canadian Bond Index ETF	0.83%	2.17%	4.26%	4.11%	-9.05%	2.30%
HBB.TO Global X Canadian Select Universe Bond Index Corporate Class ETF	0.62%	1.84%	3.96%	5.76%	-11.94%	2.49%

Correlation

The correlation between CCBI.TO and HBB.TO is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.76
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.74
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.57
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2021	0.55

Over the past year, CCBI.TO and HBB.TO have become more correlated (0.76) than their long-term average of 0.55, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

CCBI.TO vs. HBB.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCBI.TO

CCBI.TO Risk / Return Rank: 36
CCBI.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
CCBI.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
CCBI.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 37
CCBI.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
CCBI.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 34

HBB.TO

HBB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 30
HBB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
HBB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
HBB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 28
HBB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
HBB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCBI.TO vs. HBB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CIBC Canadian Bond Index ETF (CCBI.TO) and Global X Canadian Select Universe Bond Index Corporate Class ETF (HBB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CCBI.TO	HBB.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.88	0.74	+0.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.30	1.03	+0.27
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.13	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.36	1.16	+0.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.35	2.75	+0.60

CCBI.TO vs. HBB.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCBI.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is comparable to the HBB.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCBI.TO and HBB.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CCBI.TO vs. HBB.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCBI.TO drawdown since its inception was -17.72%, roughly equal to the maximum HBB.TO drawdown of -18.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCBI.TO and HBB.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	CCBI.TO	HBB.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.72%	-18.23%	+0.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.72%	-2.78%	+0.06%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.34%	-4.51%	+0.17%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.72%	-16.19%	-1.53%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-18.23%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.64%	-3.79%	+1.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.90%	-4.56%	-3.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.10%	1.17%	-0.07%

Volatility

CCBI.TO vs. HBB.TO - Volatility Comparison

CIBC Canadian Bond Index ETF (CCBI.TO) and Global X Canadian Select Universe Bond Index Corporate Class ETF (HBB.TO) have volatilities of 1.15% and 1.17%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CCBI.TO	HBB.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.15%	1.17%	-0.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.34%	3.45%	-0.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.20%	4.37%	-0.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.82%	6.54%	+0.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.97%	7.09%	-0.12%

CCBI.TO vs. HBB.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CCBI.TO has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than HBB.TO's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

CCBI.TO vs. HBB.TO - Dividend Comparison

CCBI.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.36%, while HBB.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CCBI.TO CIBC Canadian Bond Index ETF	3.36%	3.22%	2.85%	2.78%	2.60%	1.78%
HBB.TO Global X Canadian Select Universe Bond Index Corporate Class ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CCBI.TO and HBB.TO in my portfolio?

CCBI.TO and HBB.TO have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CCBI.TO or HBB.TO?

On fees, CCBI.TO is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CCBI.TO or HBB.TO?

CCBI.TO is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for HBB.TO.

What is the main difference between CCBI.TO and HBB.TO?

CCBI.TO tracks FTSE Canada Universe Bond Index, while HBB.TO tracks Solactive Canadian Select Universe Bond. They also come from different issuers: CIBC Asset Management Inc. and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for CCBI.TO and 0.09% for HBB.TO.