PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CCALX vs. HRSMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CCALX vs. HRSMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Conestoga Small Cap Fund Institutional Class (CCALX) and Hood River Small-Cap Growth Fund (HRSMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCALX achieves a 3.27% return, which is significantly lower than HRSMX's 19.18% return. Over the past 10 years, CCALX has underperformed HRSMX with an annualized return of 9.10%, while HRSMX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.25% annualized return.


CCALX

1D
0.73%
1M
-4.09%
6M
0.68%
YTD
3.27%
1Y
1.61%
3Y*
0.90%
5Y*
-1.32%
10Y*
9.10%
ALL TIME*
9.08%

HRSMX

1D
-1.18%
1M
-9.70%
6M
8.79%
YTD
19.18%
1Y
46.99%
3Y*
27.12%
5Y*
13.16%
10Y*
18.25%
ALL TIME*
13.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

CCALX vs. HRSMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CCALX
Conestoga Small Cap Fund Institutional Class
3.27%-10.83%8.96%22.36%-28.16%16.25%30.59%25.42%0.79%28.72%
HRSMX
Hood River Small-Cap Growth Fund
19.18%23.85%35.48%21.52%-27.99%23.19%60.80%24.13%-6.91%20.60%

Correlation

The correlation between CCALX and HRSMX is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 14, 2014

0.86

The correlation between CCALX and HRSMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.86 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CCALX vs. HRSMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CCALX
CCALX Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
CCALX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCALX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCALX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
CCALX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCALX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

HRSMX
HRSMX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
HRSMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HRSMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
HRSMX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
HRSMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
HRSMX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CCALX vs. HRSMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Conestoga Small Cap Fund Institutional Class (CCALX) and Hood River Small-Cap Growth Fund (HRSMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CCALXHRSMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.25

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.05

2.79

-2.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.13

10.90

-10.78

CCALX vs. HRSMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCALX Sharpe Ratio is 0.04, which is lower than the HRSMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCALX and HRSMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CCALX vs. HRSMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCALX drawdown since its inception was -38.06%, smaller than the maximum HRSMX drawdown of -64.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCALX and HRSMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CCALXHRSMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.06%

-64.92%

+26.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.47%

-15.78%

+1.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.69%

-33.04%

+5.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.06%

-38.49%

+0.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.06%

-40.74%

+2.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.37%

-13.57%

-2.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.38%

-13.02%

+2.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.64%

4.03%

+1.61%

Volatility

CCALX vs. HRSMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Conestoga Small Cap Fund Institutional Class (CCALX) is 4.91%, while Hood River Small-Cap Growth Fund (HRSMX) has a volatility of 9.06%. This indicates that CCALX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HRSMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CCALXHRSMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.91%

9.06%

-4.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.94%

23.37%

-9.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.14%

28.87%

-9.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.89%

27.66%

-5.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.50%

26.16%

-4.66%

CCALX vs. HRSMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CCALX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than HRSMX's 1.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

CCALX vs. HRSMX - Dividend Comparison

CCALX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.26%, more than HRSMX's 3.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CCALX
Conestoga Small Cap Fund Institutional Class
5.26%5.43%0.00%0.84%4.04%5.18%0.00%2.11%1.45%5.59%1.18%1.87%
HRSMX
Hood River Small-Cap Growth Fund
3.55%4.23%3.75%0.00%0.00%19.96%6.28%0.00%4.59%6.74%0.00%5.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


CCALX and HRSMX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HRSMX has higher volatility (9.06%) compared to CCALX (4.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCALX dropped -38.06% vs HRSMX's -64.92%.

HRSMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CCALX and HRSMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer