PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CC1U.L vs. MWRD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CC1U.L vs. MWRD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI China UCITS ETF-C USD (CC1U.L) and Amundi Index MSCI World (MWRD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CC1U.L is traded in USD, while MWRD.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the MWRD.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period


CC1U.L

1D
-1.55%
1M
-3.48%
YTD
0.83%
6M
0.56%
1Y
29.87%
3Y*
6.80%
5Y*
0.89%
10Y*
4.02%

MWRD.L

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CC1U.L vs. MWRD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CC1U.L
Amundi MSCI China UCITS ETF-C USD
0.83%39.49%1.53%-11.33%-9.32%-3.10%-1.85%12.90%-14.42%15.88%
MWRD.L
Amundi Index MSCI World
0.00%0.00%-1.64%23.69%-18.69%22.97%15.27%28.71%-9.87%10.61%

Correlation

The correlation between CC1U.L and MWRD.L is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2017

0.41

The correlation between CC1U.L and MWRD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (3 years) to 0.41 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CC1U.L vs. MWRD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CC1U.L
MWRD.L

Technology

29.6%
24.7%

Consumer Cyclical

20.7%
10.5%

Industrials

13.4%
10.6%

Basic Materials

13.0%
3.8%

Communication Services

10.0%
7.5%

Healthcare

6.6%
12.4%

Utilities

3.4%
2.4%

Real Estate

1.5%
2.4%

Financial Services

1.3%
14.7%

Consumer Defensive

0.5%
6.7%

Energy

-

4.4%

Technology

CC1U.L
29.6%
MWRD.L
24.7%

Consumer Cyclical

CC1U.L
20.7%
MWRD.L
10.5%

Industrials

CC1U.L
13.4%
MWRD.L
10.6%

Basic Materials

CC1U.L
13.0%
MWRD.L
3.8%

Communication Services

CC1U.L
10.0%
MWRD.L
7.5%

Healthcare

CC1U.L
6.6%
MWRD.L
12.4%

Utilities

CC1U.L
3.4%
MWRD.L
2.4%

Real Estate

CC1U.L
1.5%
MWRD.L
2.4%

Financial Services

CC1U.L
1.3%
MWRD.L
14.7%

Consumer Defensive

CC1U.L
0.5%
MWRD.L
6.7%

Energy

CC1U.L

-

MWRD.L
4.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CC1U.L vs. MWRD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CC1U.L
CC1U.L Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
CC1U.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CC1U.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
CC1U.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
CC1U.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
CC1U.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

MWRD.L
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CC1U.L vs. MWRD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI China UCITS ETF-C USD (CC1U.L) and Amundi Index MSCI World (MWRD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CC1U.LMWRD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.31

CC1U.L vs. MWRD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CC1U.LMWRD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.18

Drawdowns

CC1U.L vs. MWRD.L - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CC1U.LMWRD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.32%

Volatility

CC1U.L vs. MWRD.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CC1U.LMWRD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.25%

CC1U.L vs. MWRD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CC1U.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than MWRD.L's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

CC1U.L vs. MWRD.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither CC1U.L nor MWRD.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


CC1U.L and MWRD.L have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MWRD.L is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MWRD.L is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for CC1U.L.

CC1U.L is categorized as China Equities, while MWRD.L is Global Equities. CC1U.L tracks MSCI China NR USD, while MWRD.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for CC1U.L and 0.08% for MWRD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CC1U.L and MWRD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer