CBXY vs. JULB

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

CBXY (Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - July) and JULB (Aptus July Buffer ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. CBXY is passively managed, while JULB is actively managed. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CBXY charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for JULB.

Performance

CBXY vs. JULB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - July (CBXY) and Aptus July Buffer ETF (JULB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBXY achieves a -4.51% return, which is significantly lower than JULB's 8.05% return.

CBXY

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 0.59%
• 6M: -7.02%
• YTD: -4.51%
• 1Y: -12.80%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

JULB

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: 1.40%
• 6M: 7.20%
• YTD: 8.05%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBXY vs. JULB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CBXY Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - July	-4.51%	-9.11%
JULB Aptus July Buffer ETF	8.05%	2.44%

Correlation

The correlation between CBXY and JULB is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2025	0.41

Return for Risk

CBXY vs. JULB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBXY

CBXY Risk / Return Rank: 2
CBXY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
CBXY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
CBXY Omega Ratio Rank: 1
CBXY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
CBXY Martin Ratio Rank: 4

JULB

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBXY vs. JULB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - July (CBXY) and Aptus July Buffer ETF (JULB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CBXY	JULB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.33	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.79	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.78	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.78	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.12	—	—

Drawdowns

CBXY vs. JULB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBXY drawdown since its inception was -16.43%, which is greater than JULB's maximum drawdown of -5.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBXY and JULB.

Drawdown Indicators

	CBXY	JULB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.43%	-5.24%	-11.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.43%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.09%	-0.23%	-14.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.61%	-0.78%	-8.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.44%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CBXY	JULB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.33%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.84%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.72%	6.69%	+3.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.86%	6.69%	+3.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.86%	6.69%	+3.17%

CBXY vs. JULB - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBXY has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than JULB's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

CBXY vs. JULB - Dividend Comparison

CBXY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, while JULB has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
CBXY Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - July	1.44%	1.38%
JULB Aptus July Buffer ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CBXY and JULB in my portfolio?

CBXY and JULB have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CBXY or JULB?

On fees, JULB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CBXY or JULB?

JULB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for CBXY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CBXY or JULB?

CBXY has the higher dividend yield at 1.44%, compared with 0.00% for JULB.

What is the main difference between CBXY and JULB?

They also come from different issuers: Calamos and Aptus Capital Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for CBXY and 0.25% for JULB.