PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CBXO vs. CAGE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CBXO vs. CAGE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - October (CBXO) and Calamos Autocallable Growth ETF (CAGE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


CBXO

1D
0.09%
1M
0.43%
6M
-1.51%
YTD
-3.32%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

CAGE

1D
3.40%
1M
5.64%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.54M$3.19M$2.74M
$51.16K$48.37K$55.02K

CBXO vs. CAGE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CBXO and CAGE is 0.35, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2026

0.35

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CBXO vs. CAGE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - October (CBXO) and Calamos Autocallable Growth ETF (CAGE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CBXO vs. CAGE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CBXO vs. CAGE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBXO drawdown since its inception was -11.51%, which is greater than CAGE's maximum drawdown of -6.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBXO and CAGE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CBXOCAGEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.51%

-6.67%

-4.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.11%

0.00%

-11.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.03%

-2.00%

-7.03%

Volatility

CBXO vs. CAGE - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CBXOCAGEDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.46%

22.46%

-16.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.46%

22.46%

-16.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.46%

22.46%

-16.00%

CBXO vs. CAGE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBXO has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than CAGE's 0.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

CBXO vs. CAGE - Dividend Comparison

CBXO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, while CAGE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


CBXO and CAGE have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CBXO is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CBXO is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for CAGE.

CBXO has the higher dividend yield at 0.52%, compared with 0.00% for CAGE.

Their fees differ too: 0.69% for CBXO and 0.74% for CAGE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CBXO and CAGE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer