CBXO vs. BETE

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

CBXO (Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - October) and BETE (Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CBXO is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Calamos, while BETE is a Cryptocurrency fund managed by ProShares. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CBXO charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BETE.

Performance

CBXO vs. BETE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - October (CBXO) and Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF (BETE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBXO achieves a -3.74% return, which is significantly higher than BETE's -41.67% return.

CBXO

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.38%
• YTD: -3.74%
• 6M: -3.78%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BETE

• 1D: -1.16%
• 1M: -23.42%
• YTD: -41.67%
• 6M: -41.18%
• 1Y: -41.25%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBXO vs. BETE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CBXO Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - October	-3.74%	-8.05%
BETE Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF	-41.67%	-34.43%

Correlation

The correlation between CBXO and BETE is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2025	0.81

Return for Risk

CBXO vs. BETE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBXO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BETE

BETE Risk / Return Rank: 4
BETE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
BETE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
BETE Omega Ratio Rank: 4
BETE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
BETE Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBXO vs. BETE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - October (CBXO) and Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF (BETE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CBXO	BETE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	-0.74	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	-0.94	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	0.90	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	-0.67	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	-1.14	—

Drawdowns

CBXO vs. BETE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBXO drawdown since its inception was -11.51%, smaller than the maximum BETE drawdown of -61.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBXO and BETE.

Drawdown Indicators

	CBXO	BETE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.51%	-61.75%	+50.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-61.75%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.49%	-61.75%	+50.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.69%	-22.21%	+13.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	36.38%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CBXO	BETE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	16.09%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	40.25%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.90%	55.79%	-48.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.90%	56.57%	-49.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.90%	56.57%	-49.67%

CBXO vs. BETE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBXO has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than BETE's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

CBXO vs. BETE - Dividend Comparison

CBXO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, less than BETE's 94.76% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BETE Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF	94.76%	68.22%	15.22%	0.78%
CBXO Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - October	0.53%	0.51%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CBXO and BETE in my portfolio?

CBXO and BETE have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CBXO or BETE?

On fees, CBXO is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CBXO or BETE?

CBXO is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BETE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CBXO or BETE?

BETE has the higher dividend yield at 94.76%, compared with 0.53% for CBXO.

What is the main difference between CBXO and BETE?

CBXO is categorized as Defined Outcome, while BETE is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: Calamos and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for CBXO and 0.95% for BETE.