CBUT.DE vs. METU.L
CBUT.DE (iShares Blockchain Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and METU.L (Franklin AI, Metaverse and Blockchain UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both Technology Equities funds - CBUT.DE tracks the NYSE FactSet Global Blockchain Technologies Capped while METU.L tracks the Solactive Global Metaverse Innovation Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CBUT.DE returned 44.53%/yr vs 26.48%/yr for METU.L. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CBUT.DE charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for METU.L.
Performance
CBUT.DE vs. METU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CBUT.DE is traded in EUR, while METU.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the METU.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CBUT.DE achieves a 26.50% return, which is significantly higher than METU.L's 20.35% return.
CBUT.DE
- 1D
- -3.41%
- 1M
- 2.84%
- YTD
- 26.50%
- 6M
- 13.62%
- 1Y
- 59.61%
- 3Y*
- 44.53%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
METU.L
- 1D
- -1.78%
- 1M
- 14.34%
- YTD
- 20.35%
- 6M
- 14.13%
- 1Y
- 39.04%
- 3Y*
- 26.48%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CBUT.DE vs. METU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBUT.DE iShares Blockchain Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 26.50% | 13.17% | 12.43% | 235.40% | -36.41% |
METU.L Franklin AI, Metaverse and Blockchain UCITS ETF USD Acc | 20.35% | 4.71% | 27.88% | 70.35% | -14.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between CBUT.DE and METU.L is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2022 | 0.76 |
The correlation between CBUT.DE and METU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CBUT.DE vs. METU.L — Risk / Return Rank
CBUT.DE
METU.L
CBUT.DE vs. METU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Blockchain Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CBUT.DE) and Franklin AI, Metaverse and Blockchain UCITS ETF USD Acc (METU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CBUT.DE | METU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.27 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.46 | 1.34 | +0.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.77 | 3.19 | -0.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CBUT.DE | METU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.22 | 1.58 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.76 | -0.09 |
Drawdowns
CBUT.DE vs. METU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CBUT.DE drawdown since its inception was -53.95%, which is greater than METU.L's maximum drawdown of -33.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBUT.DE and METU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CBUT.DE | METU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.95% | -33.39% | -20.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.09% | -29.73% | -13.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.95% | -33.39% | -20.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.86% | -2.86% | -12.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.96% | -9.79% | -10.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.75% | 12.51% | +10.24% |
Volatility
CBUT.DE vs. METU.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Blockchain Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CBUT.DE) has a higher volatility of 14.16% compared to Franklin AI, Metaverse and Blockchain UCITS ETF USD Acc (METU.L) at 7.57%. This indicates that CBUT.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than METU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CBUT.DE | METU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.16% | 7.57% | +6.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.13% | 18.29% | +17.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.55% | 25.25% | +26.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 60.46% | 27.79% | +32.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 60.46% | 27.79% | +32.67% |
CBUT.DE vs. METU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CBUT.DE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than METU.L's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
CBUT.DE vs. METU.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither CBUT.DE nor METU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CBUT.DE and METU.L have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, METU.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
METU.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for CBUT.DE.
CBUT.DE tracks NYSE FactSet Global Blockchain Technologies Capped, while METU.L tracks Solactive Global Metaverse Innovation Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for CBUT.DE and 0.30% for METU.L.
Find the right allocation for CBUT.DE and METU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer