CBUK.DE vs. ES6Y.DE
CBUK.DE (iShares MSCI China Tech UCITS ETF USD Acc) and ES6Y.DE (L&G Emerging Cyber Security ESG Exclusions UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) are both Technology Equities funds - CBUK.DE tracks the MSCI China Technology Sub-Industries ESG Screened Select Capped while ES6Y.DE tracks the Solactive Emerging Cyber Security. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CBUK.DE returned 13.37%/yr vs 33.66%/yr for ES6Y.DE. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CBUK.DE charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for ES6Y.DE.
Performance
CBUK.DE vs. ES6Y.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CBUK.DE achieves a 2.62% return, which is significantly lower than ES6Y.DE's 59.99% return.
CBUK.DE
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 4.25%
- YTD
- 2.62%
- 6M
- 0.39%
- 1Y
- 20.86%
- 3Y*
- 13.37%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ES6Y.DE
- 1D
- -0.82%
- 1M
- 24.01%
- YTD
- 59.99%
- 6M
- 53.64%
- 1Y
- 57.05%
- 3Y*
- 33.66%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CBUK.DE vs. ES6Y.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBUK.DE iShares MSCI China Tech UCITS ETF USD Acc | 2.62% | 21.05% | 18.05% | -9.04% | -5.67% |
ES6Y.DE L&G Emerging Cyber Security ESG Exclusions UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 59.99% | -9.21% | 34.05% | 51.62% | -18.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between CBUK.DE and ES6Y.DE is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2022 | 0.31 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CBUK.DE vs. ES6Y.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CBUK.DE
ES6Y.DE
CBUK.DE vs. ES6Y.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI China Tech UCITS ETF USD Acc (CBUK.DE) and L&G Emerging Cyber Security ESG Exclusions UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (ES6Y.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CBUK.DE | ES6Y.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.36 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.92 | 3.77 | -2.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.88 | 9.25 | -7.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CBUK.DE | ES6Y.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 | 2.18 | -1.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 0.99 | -0.77 |
Drawdowns
CBUK.DE vs. ES6Y.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CBUK.DE drawdown since its inception was -37.29%, which is greater than ES6Y.DE's maximum drawdown of -34.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBUK.DE and ES6Y.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CBUK.DE | ES6Y.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.29% | -34.72% | -2.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.99% | -15.05% | -8.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.54% | -34.72% | +6.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.37% | -1.36% | -10.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.27% | -9.52% | -6.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.77% | 6.15% | +5.62% |
Volatility
CBUK.DE vs. ES6Y.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI China Tech UCITS ETF USD Acc (CBUK.DE) is 8.51%, while L&G Emerging Cyber Security ESG Exclusions UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (ES6Y.DE) has a volatility of 10.01%. This indicates that CBUK.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ES6Y.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CBUK.DE | ES6Y.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.51% | 10.01% | -1.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.60% | 20.66% | -4.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.47% | 26.06% | -2.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.52% | 26.64% | +4.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.52% | 26.64% | +4.88% |
CBUK.DE vs. ES6Y.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CBUK.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than ES6Y.DE's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
CBUK.DE vs. ES6Y.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CBUK.DE nor ES6Y.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CBUK.DE and ES6Y.DE have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CBUK.DE is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CBUK.DE is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for ES6Y.DE.
CBUK.DE tracks MSCI China Technology Sub-Industries ESG Screened Select Capped, while ES6Y.DE tracks Solactive Emerging Cyber Security. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for CBUK.DE and 0.49% for ES6Y.DE.
Find the right allocation for CBUK.DE and ES6Y.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer