PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CBUG.L vs. ISAC.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CBUG.L vs. ISAC.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares $ Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (CBUG.L) and iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAC.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CBUG.L is traded in GBP, while ISAC.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ISAC.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBUG.L achieves a -0.32% return, which is significantly lower than ISAC.L's 10.73% return.


CBUG.L

1D
-0.01%
1M
-0.01%
6M
-0.32%
YTD
-0.32%
1Y
3.51%
3Y*
4.04%
5Y*
0.23%
10Y*

ISAC.L

1D
-0.92%
1M
-1.47%
6M
9.00%
YTD
10.73%
1Y
22.42%
3Y*
17.72%
5Y*
11.51%
10Y*
12.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBUG.L vs. ISAC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
CBUG.L
iShares $ Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)
-0.32%7.43%2.25%4.06%-9.97%-2.45%6.70%3.97%
ISAC.L
iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
10.73%13.64%19.87%16.44%-8.43%19.97%12.26%13.28%

Correlation

The correlation between CBUG.L and ISAC.L is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2019

-0.09

The correlation between CBUG.L and ISAC.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (all time) to 0.17 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CBUG.L vs. ISAC.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBUG.L
CBUG.L Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
CBUG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBUG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBUG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
CBUG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBUG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

ISAC.L
ISAC.L Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
ISAC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISAC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISAC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
ISAC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISAC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBUG.L vs. ISAC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares $ Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (CBUG.L) and iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CBUG.LISAC.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.33

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.27

3.25

-1.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.38

11.85

-8.47

CBUG.L vs. ISAC.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBUG.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is lower than the ISAC.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBUG.L and ISAC.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CBUG.L vs. ISAC.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBUG.L drawdown since its inception was -14.47%, smaller than the maximum ISAC.L drawdown of -25.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBUG.L and ISAC.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CBUG.LISAC.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.47%

-25.84%

+11.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.59%

-6.88%

+4.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.28%

-18.33%

+14.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.78%

-18.33%

+4.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.52%

-2.45%

+0.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.80%

-3.51%

-1.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.97%

1.89%

-0.92%

Volatility

CBUG.L vs. ISAC.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares $ Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (CBUG.L) is 1.00%, while iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAC.L) has a volatility of 3.31%. This indicates that CBUG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ISAC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CBUG.LISAC.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.00%

3.31%

-2.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.54%

10.05%

-7.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.38%

12.43%

-8.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.31%

14.39%

-9.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.70%

15.40%

-10.70%

CBUG.L vs. ISAC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBUG.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than ISAC.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CBUG.L vs. ISAC.L - Dividend Comparison

CBUG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.13%, while ISAC.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
CBUG.L
iShares $ Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)
4.13%4.17%4.21%3.04%1.69%1.15%2.07%1.15%
ISAC.L
iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CBUG.L and ISAC.L have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CBUG.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CBUG.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for ISAC.L.

CBUG.L is categorized as Government Bonds, while ISAC.L is Global Equities. CBUG.L tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 3-7 Year Bond Index, while ISAC.L tracks MSCI All Country World Index (Net). Their fees differ too: 0.10% for CBUG.L and 0.20% for ISAC.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CBUG.L and ISAC.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer