PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CBUG.DE vs. DX2E.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CBUG.DE vs. DX2E.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares USD Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF GBP hedged (Dist) (CBUG.DE) and Xtrackers S&P Global Infrastructure Swap UCITS ETF (Acc) (DX2E.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBUG.DE achieves a 16.41% return, which is significantly higher than DX2E.DE's 12.97% return.


CBUG.DE

1D
-0.16%
1M
-0.00%
6M
11.31%
YTD
16.41%
1Y
28.15%
3Y*
14.07%
5Y*
10Y*

DX2E.DE

1D
-0.43%
1M
1.79%
6M
11.15%
YTD
12.97%
1Y
19.57%
3Y*
14.46%
5Y*
11.16%
10Y*
7.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBUG.DE vs. DX2E.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CBUG.DE
iShares USD Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF GBP hedged (Dist)
16.41%6.50%13.10%11.25%-14.07%2.02%
DX2E.DE
Xtrackers S&P Global Infrastructure Swap UCITS ETF (Acc)
12.97%7.67%20.50%1.50%5.79%3.11%

Correlation

The correlation between CBUG.DE and DX2E.DE is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2021

0.57

Over the past year, the correlation between CBUG.DE and DX2E.DE has dropped to 0.33 - well below their long-term average of 0.57, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CBUG.DE vs. DX2E.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBUG.DE
CBUG.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
CBUG.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBUG.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBUG.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
CBUG.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBUG.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

DX2E.DE
DX2E.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
DX2E.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DX2E.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
DX2E.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
DX2E.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
DX2E.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBUG.DE vs. DX2E.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF GBP hedged (Dist) (CBUG.DE) and Xtrackers S&P Global Infrastructure Swap UCITS ETF (Acc) (DX2E.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CBUG.DEDX2E.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.35

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.87

4.07

-0.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.52

10.13

+4.39

CBUG.DE vs. DX2E.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBUG.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is comparable to the DX2E.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBUG.DE and DX2E.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CBUG.DE vs. DX2E.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBUG.DE drawdown since its inception was -24.57%, smaller than the maximum DX2E.DE drawdown of -63.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBUG.DE and DX2E.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CBUG.DEDX2E.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.57%

-63.84%

+39.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.24%

-4.79%

-2.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.57%

-14.59%

-9.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.40%

-1.22%

-1.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.34%

-18.81%

+11.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.93%

1.93%

0.00%

Volatility

CBUG.DE vs. DX2E.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares USD Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF GBP hedged (Dist) (CBUG.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.78% compared to Xtrackers S&P Global Infrastructure Swap UCITS ETF (Acc) (DX2E.DE) at 2.80%. This indicates that CBUG.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DX2E.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CBUG.DEDX2E.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.78%

2.80%

+0.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.23%

7.77%

+2.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.19%

9.80%

+4.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.64%

12.20%

+4.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.64%

14.75%

+1.89%

CBUG.DE vs. DX2E.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBUG.DE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than DX2E.DE's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

CBUG.DE vs. DX2E.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither CBUG.DE nor DX2E.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


CBUG.DE and DX2E.DE have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CBUG.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CBUG.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for DX2E.DE.

CBUG.DE tracks MSCI ACWI SMID NR USD, while DX2E.DE tracks S&P Global Infrastructure Net Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for CBUG.DE and 0.60% for DX2E.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CBUG.DE and DX2E.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer