PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CBUF.DE vs. IBDT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CBUF.DE vs. IBDT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist (CBUF.DE) and iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Corporate ETF (IBDT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CBUF.DE is traded in EUR, while IBDT is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IBDT values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBUF.DE achieves a -2.22% return, which is significantly lower than IBDT's 2.03% return.


CBUF.DE

1D
2.74%
1M
3.91%
YTD
-2.22%
6M
-1.50%
1Y
7.40%
3Y*
0.62%
5Y*
4.66%
10Y*

IBDT

1D
-0.04%
1M
1.00%
YTD
2.03%
6M
1.64%
1Y
2.73%
3Y*
2.77%
5Y*
2.36%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBUF.DE vs. IBDT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
CBUF.DE
iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist
-2.22%2.56%0.75%0.33%2.09%30.42%2.79%11.42%
IBDT
iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Corporate ETF
2.03%-5.68%10.83%4.49%-5.93%5.43%0.58%0.19%

Correlation

The correlation between CBUF.DE and IBDT is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2019

0.17

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CBUF.DE vs. IBDT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBUF.DE
CBUF.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
CBUF.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBUF.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBUF.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
CBUF.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBUF.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

IBDT
IBDT Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
IBDT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBDT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBDT Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
IBDT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBDT Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBUF.DE vs. IBDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist (CBUF.DE) and iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Corporate ETF (IBDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CBUF.DEIBDTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.09

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.68

0.76

-0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.56

2.03

-0.47

CBUF.DE vs. IBDT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBUF.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.53, which is comparable to the IBDT Sharpe Ratio of 0.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBUF.DE and IBDT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CBUF.DEIBDTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

0.48

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

0.31

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.50

-0.06

Drawdowns

CBUF.DE vs. IBDT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBUF.DE drawdown since its inception was -25.94%, which is greater than IBDT's maximum drawdown of -15.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBUF.DE and IBDT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CBUF.DEIBDTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.94%

-15.50%

-10.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.87%

-3.63%

-7.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.76%

-10.23%

-11.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.76%

-10.57%

-11.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.66%

-5.25%

-4.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.65%

-4.04%

-1.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.74%

1.37%

+3.37%

Volatility

CBUF.DE vs. IBDT - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist (CBUF.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.98% compared to iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Corporate ETF (IBDT) at 1.02%. This indicates that CBUF.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBDT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CBUF.DEIBDTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.98%

1.02%

+3.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.70%

4.03%

+5.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.98%

5.75%

+8.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.60%

7.55%

+6.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.36%

8.27%

+7.09%

CBUF.DE vs. IBDT - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBUF.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than IBDT's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CBUF.DE vs. IBDT - Dividend Comparison

CBUF.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, less than IBDT's 4.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
CBUF.DE
iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist
1.08%1.06%1.02%1.16%1.09%1.05%1.27%0.10%0.00%
IBDT
iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Corporate ETF
4.54%4.56%4.67%4.10%3.25%2.45%2.80%3.32%1.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


CBUF.DE and IBDT have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IBDT is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IBDT is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for CBUF.DE.

CBUF.DE is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while IBDT is Corporate Bonds. CBUF.DE tracks MSCI World Health Care ESG Reduced Carbon Select 20 35 Capped, while IBDT tracks Bloomberg December 2028 Maturity Corporate Index. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for CBUF.DE and 0.10% for IBDT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CBUF.DE and IBDT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer