CBU7.L vs. 4GLD.DE
CBU7.L (iShares $ Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF USD Acc) and 4GLD.DE (Xetra-Gold) are both exchange-traded funds - CBU7.L is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 3-7 Year Bond Index, while 4GLD.DE is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CBU7.L returned 1.39%/yr vs 13.62%/yr for 4GLD.DE. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CBU7.L charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for 4GLD.DE.
Performance
CBU7.L vs. 4GLD.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CBU7.L is traded in USD, while 4GLD.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the 4GLD.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CBU7.L achieves a -0.52% return, which is significantly lower than 4GLD.DE's 1.62% return. Over the past 10 years, CBU7.L has underperformed 4GLD.DE with an annualized return of 1.39%, while 4GLD.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 13.62% annualized return.
CBU7.L
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- -0.13%
- YTD
- -0.52%
- 6M
- -0.10%
- 1Y
- 3.16%
- 3Y*
- 3.73%
- 5Y*
- 0.39%
- 10Y*
- 1.39%
4GLD.DE
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- -2.23%
- YTD
- 1.62%
- 6M
- 6.12%
- 1Y
- 32.50%
- 3Y*
- 31.68%
- 5Y*
- 18.74%
- 10Y*
- 13.62%
CBU7.L vs. 4GLD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBU7.L iShares $ Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF USD Acc | -0.52% | 7.34% | 2.16% | 4.26% | -9.35% | -2.35% | 6.98% | 6.06% | 1.21% | 1.26% |
4GLD.DE Xetra-Gold | 1.62% | 68.58% | 26.88% | 12.77% | 1.22% | -4.18% | 24.10% | 18.68% | -1.65% | 12.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between CBU7.L and 4GLD.DE is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2011 | 0.27 |
The correlation between CBU7.L and 4GLD.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (1 year) to 0.35 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CBU7.L vs. 4GLD.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CBU7.L
4GLD.DE
CBU7.L vs. 4GLD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares $ Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF USD Acc (CBU7.L) and Xetra-Gold (4GLD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CBU7.L | 4GLD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.25 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.26 | 1.89 | -0.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.06 | 4.82 | -0.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CBU7.L | 4GLD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.07 | 1.33 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 | 1.07 | -0.99 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 | 0.87 | -0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.52 | +0.06 |
Drawdowns
CBU7.L vs. 4GLD.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CBU7.L drawdown since its inception was -14.18%, smaller than the maximum 4GLD.DE drawdown of -44.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBU7.L and 4GLD.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CBU7.L | 4GLD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.18% | -44.57% | +30.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.50% | -17.15% | +14.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.66% | -17.15% | +13.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.55% | -21.18% | +7.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -14.18% | -21.18% | +7.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.60% | -15.56% | +13.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.33% | -16.99% | +13.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.77% | 6.73% | -5.96% |
Volatility
CBU7.L vs. 4GLD.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares $ Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF USD Acc (CBU7.L) is 1.13%, while Xetra-Gold (4GLD.DE) has a volatility of 5.66%. This indicates that CBU7.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 4GLD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CBU7.L | 4GLD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.13% | 5.66% | -4.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.15% | 20.99% | -18.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.96% | 24.25% | -21.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.70% | 17.29% | -12.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.10% | 15.56% | -11.46% |
CBU7.L vs. 4GLD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CBU7.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than 4GLD.DE's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CBU7.L vs. 4GLD.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CBU7.L nor 4GLD.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CBU7.L and 4GLD.DE have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, 4GLD.DE is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
4GLD.DE is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for CBU7.L.
CBU7.L is categorized as Government Bonds, while 4GLD.DE is Gold. CBU7.L tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 3-7 Year Bond Index, while 4GLD.DE tracks LBMA Gold Price. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Deutsche Börse Commodities. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for CBU7.L and 0.00% for 4GLD.DE.
Find the right allocation for CBU7.L and 4GLD.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer