CBU0.DE vs. XT01.DE
CBU0.DE (iShares Core GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc) and XT01.DE (Xtrackers US Treasuries Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - CBU0.DE is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the iBoxx® GBP Liquid Corporates Large Cap (EUR Hedged), while XT01.DE is a Government Bonds fund tracking the FTSE US Treasury Short Duration Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CBU0.DE returned 3.94%/yr vs 1.88%/yr for XT01.DE. At a correlation of -0.23, they often move in opposite directions. CBU0.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for XT01.DE.
Performance
CBU0.DE vs. XT01.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CBU0.DE achieves a -0.89% return, which is significantly lower than XT01.DE's 2.61% return.
CBU0.DE
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 1.62%
- YTD
- -0.89%
- 6M
- -0.90%
- 1Y
- 2.46%
- 3Y*
- 3.94%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XT01.DE
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 0.98%
- YTD
- 2.61%
- 6M
- 2.04%
- 1Y
- 2.13%
- 3Y*
- 1.88%
- 5Y*
- 4.31%
- 10Y*
- —
CBU0.DE vs. XT01.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CBU0.DE iShares Core GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc | -0.89% | 4.58% | -0.25% | 5.06% |
XT01.DE Xtrackers US Treasuries Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF 1C | 2.61% | -7.30% | 11.24% | 1.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between CBU0.DE and XT01.DE is -0.37, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2023 | -0.23 |
The correlation between CBU0.DE and XT01.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.37 (1 year) to -0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CBU0.DE vs. XT01.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CBU0.DE
XT01.DE
CBU0.DE vs. XT01.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (CBU0.DE) and Xtrackers US Treasuries Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XT01.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CBU0.DE | XT01.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.06 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.58 | 0.63 | -0.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.62 | 1.33 | +0.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CBU0.DE | XT01.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 | 0.35 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.44 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
CBU0.DE vs. XT01.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CBU0.DE drawdown since its inception was -6.02%, smaller than the maximum XT01.DE drawdown of -11.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBU0.DE and XT01.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CBU0.DE | XT01.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.02% | -11.68% | +5.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.20% | -3.40% | -0.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.20% | -11.68% | +7.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -11.68% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.03% | -7.19% | +5.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.65% | -4.90% | +3.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.52% | 1.60% | -0.08% |
Volatility
CBU0.DE vs. XT01.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (CBU0.DE) has a higher volatility of 2.00% compared to Xtrackers US Treasuries Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XT01.DE) at 1.25%. This indicates that CBU0.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XT01.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CBU0.DE | XT01.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.00% | 1.25% | +0.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.39% | 4.02% | +0.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.11% | 6.04% | -0.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.81% | 7.44% | -1.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.81% | 7.26% | -1.45% |
CBU0.DE vs. XT01.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CBU0.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than XT01.DE's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CBU0.DE vs. XT01.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CBU0.DE nor XT01.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CBU0.DE and XT01.DE have a correlation of -0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XT01.DE is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XT01.DE is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for CBU0.DE.
CBU0.DE is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while XT01.DE is Government Bonds. CBU0.DE tracks iBoxx® GBP Liquid Corporates Large Cap (EUR Hedged), while XT01.DE tracks FTSE US Treasury Short Duration Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for CBU0.DE and 0.06% for XT01.DE.
Find the right allocation for CBU0.DE and XT01.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer