PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CBU0.DE vs. XGBE.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CBU0.DE vs. XGBE.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Core GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (CBU0.DE) and Xtrackers EUR Corporate Green Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (XGBE.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBU0.DE achieves a -1.09% return, which is significantly lower than XGBE.DE's 0.47% return.


CBU0.DE

1D
-0.37%
1M
-0.73%
6M
-2.16%
YTD
-1.09%
1Y
1.69%
3Y*
4.05%
5Y*
10Y*

XGBE.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.46%
6M
0.07%
YTD
0.47%
1Y
1.45%
3Y*
4.05%
5Y*
-1.09%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBU0.DE vs. XGBE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CBU0.DE
iShares Core GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc
-1.09%4.57%-0.38%4.77%
XGBE.DE
Xtrackers EUR Corporate Green Bond UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.47%2.73%3.40%5.91%

Correlation

The correlation between CBU0.DE and XGBE.DE is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2023

0.72

The correlation between CBU0.DE and XGBE.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CBU0.DE vs. XGBE.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBU0.DE
CBU0.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
CBU0.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBU0.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBU0.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
CBU0.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBU0.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

XGBE.DE
XGBE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
XGBE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XGBE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
XGBE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
XGBE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
XGBE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBU0.DE vs. XGBE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (CBU0.DE) and Xtrackers EUR Corporate Green Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (XGBE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CBU0.DEXGBE.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.08

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.39

0.55

-0.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.03

1.71

-0.68

CBU0.DE vs. XGBE.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBU0.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.31, which is comparable to the XGBE.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBU0.DE and XGBE.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CBU0.DE vs. XGBE.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBU0.DE drawdown since its inception was -6.16%, smaller than the maximum XGBE.DE drawdown of -20.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBU0.DE and XGBE.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CBU0.DEXGBE.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.16%

-20.20%

+14.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.32%

-2.62%

-1.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.32%

-2.62%

-1.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.34%

-6.08%

+3.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.67%

-10.28%

+8.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.63%

0.85%

+0.78%

Volatility

CBU0.DE vs. XGBE.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (CBU0.DE) has a higher volatility of 1.52% compared to Xtrackers EUR Corporate Green Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (XGBE.DE) at 0.82%. This indicates that CBU0.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XGBE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CBU0.DEXGBE.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.52%

0.82%

+0.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.71%

2.74%

+1.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.36%

3.27%

+2.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.90%

5.05%

+0.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.90%

5.03%

+0.87%

CBU0.DE vs. XGBE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CBU0.DE and XGBE.DE have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CBU0.DE vs. XGBE.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither CBU0.DE nor XGBE.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


CBU0.DE and XGBE.DE have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CBU0.DE and XGBE.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

CBU0.DE tracks iBoxx® GBP Liquid Corporates Large Cap (EUR Hedged), while XGBE.DE tracks Bloomberg MSCI EUR Corporate and Agency Green Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CBU0.DE and XGBE.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer