PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CBU0.DE vs. QTOP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CBU0.DE vs. QTOP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Core GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (CBU0.DE) and iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF (QTOP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CBU0.DE is traded in EUR, while QTOP is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the QTOP values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBU0.DE achieves a -0.89% return, which is significantly lower than QTOP's 23.21% return.


CBU0.DE

1D
0.17%
1M
1.62%
YTD
-0.89%
6M
-0.90%
1Y
2.46%
3Y*
3.94%
5Y*
10Y*

QTOP

1D
0.00%
1M
6.98%
YTD
23.21%
6M
20.80%
1Y
43.99%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBU0.DE vs. QTOP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
CBU0.DE
iShares Core GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc
-0.89%4.58%-0.64%
QTOP
iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF
17.90%7.69%10.67%

Correlation

The correlation between CBU0.DE and QTOP is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2024

0.06

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CBU0.DE vs. QTOP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBU0.DE
CBU0.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
CBU0.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBU0.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBU0.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
CBU0.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBU0.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

QTOP
QTOP Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
QTOP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTOP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTOP Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
QTOP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTOP Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBU0.DE vs. QTOP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (CBU0.DE) and iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF (QTOP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CBU0.DEQTOPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.43

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.58

3.65

-3.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.62

11.03

-9.42

CBU0.DE vs. QTOP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBU0.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.48, which is lower than the QTOP Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBU0.DE and QTOP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CBU0.DEQTOPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

2.52

-2.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

1.12

-0.68

Drawdowns

CBU0.DE vs. QTOP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBU0.DE drawdown since its inception was -6.02%, smaller than the maximum QTOP drawdown of -27.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBU0.DE and QTOP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CBU0.DEQTOPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.02%

-27.66%

+21.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.20%

-12.11%

+7.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.03%

-0.86%

-1.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.65%

-5.63%

+3.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.52%

4.00%

-2.48%

Volatility

CBU0.DE vs. QTOP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (CBU0.DE) is 2.00%, while iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF (QTOP) has a volatility of 4.21%. This indicates that CBU0.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QTOP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CBU0.DEQTOPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.00%

4.21%

-2.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.39%

12.76%

-8.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.11%

17.59%

-12.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.81%

24.18%

-18.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.81%

24.18%

-18.37%

CBU0.DE vs. QTOP - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBU0.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than QTOP's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CBU0.DE vs. QTOP - Dividend Comparison

CBU0.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QTOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%.


PositionTTM20252024
CBU0.DE
iShares Core GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%
QTOP
iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF
0.34%0.38%0.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


CBU0.DE and QTOP have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QTOP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QTOP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for CBU0.DE.

CBU0.DE is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while QTOP is Nasdaq-100. CBU0.DE tracks iBoxx® GBP Liquid Corporates Large Cap (EUR Hedged), while QTOP tracks Nasdaq-100 Top 30 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for CBU0.DE and 0.20% for QTOP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CBU0.DE and QTOP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer