PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CBU0.DE vs. QTOP
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CBU0.DE vs. QTOP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Core GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (CBU0.DE) and iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF (QTOP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CBU0.DE vs. QTOP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
CBU0.DE
iShares Core GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc
-2.48%4.58%-0.64%
QTOP
iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF
-4.74%7.69%10.67%
Different Trading Currencies

CBU0.DE is traded in EUR, while QTOP is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the QTOP values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBU0.DE achieves a -2.48% return, which is significantly higher than QTOP's -4.74% return.


CBU0.DE

1D
0.27%
1M
-3.60%
YTD
-2.48%
6M
-0.43%
1Y
2.33%
3Y*
2.38%
5Y*
10Y*

QTOP

1D
2.85%
1M
-2.10%
YTD
-4.74%
6M
-2.08%
1Y
18.54%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CBU0.DE vs. QTOP - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBU0.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than QTOP's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

CBU0.DE vs. QTOP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBU0.DE
CBU0.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
CBU0.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBU0.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBU0.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
CBU0.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBU0.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

QTOP
QTOP Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
QTOP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTOP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTOP Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
QTOP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTOP Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBU0.DE vs. QTOP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (CBU0.DE) and iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF (QTOP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CBU0.DEQTOPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.44

0.73

-0.29

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.61

1.16

-0.56

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.17

-0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.50

1.28

-0.77

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.01

4.06

-2.05

CBU0.DE vs. QTOP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBU0.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is lower than the QTOP Sharpe Ratio of 0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBU0.DE and QTOP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CBU0.DEQTOPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

0.73

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.38

+0.01

Correlation

The correlation between CBU0.DE and QTOP is 0.02, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

CBU0.DE vs. QTOP - Dividend Comparison

CBU0.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QTOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%.


Drawdowns

CBU0.DE vs. QTOP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBU0.DE drawdown since its inception was -6.02%, smaller than the maximum QTOP drawdown of -27.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBU0.DE and QTOP.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CBU0.DEQTOPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.02%

-23.28%

+17.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.20%

-12.88%

+8.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.60%

-9.61%

+6.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.59%

-4.11%

+2.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.05%

3.74%

-2.69%

Volatility

CBU0.DE vs. QTOP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (CBU0.DE) is 2.68%, while iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF (QTOP) has a volatility of 6.14%. This indicates that CBU0.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QTOP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CBU0.DEQTOPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.68%

6.14%

-3.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.45%

14.03%

-10.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.33%

25.60%

-20.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.69%

24.96%

-19.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.69%

24.96%

-19.27%