PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CBTY vs. UXJL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CBTY vs. UXJL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - July (CBTY) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July (UXJL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBTY achieves a -11.11% return, which is significantly lower than UXJL's 11.78% return.


CBTY

1D
-0.03%
1M
-2.89%
YTD
-11.11%
6M
-14.47%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

UXJL

1D
-0.76%
1M
6.02%
YTD
11.78%
6M
11.50%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBTY vs. UXJL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CBTY and UXJL is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 22, 2025

0.40

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CBTY vs. UXJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - July (CBTY) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July (UXJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CBTY vs. UXJL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CBTYUXJLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-1.33

1.87

-3.20

Drawdowns

CBTY vs. UXJL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBTY drawdown since its inception was -26.68%, which is greater than UXJL's maximum drawdown of -10.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBTY and UXJL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CBTYUXJLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.68%

-10.29%

-16.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.68%

-0.76%

-25.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.52%

-1.51%

-13.01%

Volatility

CBTY vs. UXJL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CBTYUXJLDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.11%

13.90%

+3.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.11%

13.90%

+3.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.11%

13.90%

+3.21%

CBTY vs. UXJL - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBTY has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than UXJL's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

CBTY vs. UXJL - Dividend Comparison

CBTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.65%, while UXJL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


CBTY and UXJL have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CBTY is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CBTY is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for UXJL.

CBTY has the higher dividend yield at 1.65%, compared with 0.00% for UXJL.

They also come from different issuers: Calamos and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for CBTY and 0.85% for UXJL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CBTY and UXJL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer