PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CBSE vs. USO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CBSE vs. USO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Clough Select Equity ETF (CBSE) and United States Oil Fund LP (USO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBSE achieves a 32.12% return, which is significantly lower than USO's 97.72% return.


CBSE

1D
-0.04%
1M
8.76%
YTD
32.12%
6M
28.70%
1Y
51.01%
3Y*
31.73%
5Y*
12.51%
10Y*

USO

1D
-2.92%
1M
-5.15%
YTD
97.72%
6M
91.54%
1Y
97.20%
3Y*
28.78%
5Y*
23.67%
10Y*
3.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBSE vs. USO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
CBSE
Clough Select Equity ETF
32.12%19.53%32.20%17.29%-19.92%14.57%16.87%
USO
United States Oil Fund LP
97.72%-8.46%13.35%-4.94%28.97%64.68%17.35%

Correlation

The correlation between CBSE and USO is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2020

0.16

The correlation between CBSE and USO shifts across timeframes, from -0.19 (1 year) to 0.16 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CBSE vs. USO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBSE
CBSE Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
CBSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBSE Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
CBSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBSE Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

USO
USO Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
USO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
USO Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
USO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
USO Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBSE vs. USO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Clough Select Equity ETF (CBSE) and United States Oil Fund LP (USO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CBSEUSODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.37

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.78

4.79

-1.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.44

9.00

+2.45

CBSE vs. USO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBSE Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is comparable to the USO Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBSE and USO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CBSEUSODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.27

2.21

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.66

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.80

-0.18

+0.98

Drawdowns

CBSE vs. USO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBSE drawdown since its inception was -36.30%, smaller than the maximum USO drawdown of -98.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBSE and USO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CBSEUSODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.30%

-98.19%

+61.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.57%

-20.39%

+6.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.40%

-26.05%

-3.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.30%

-36.23%

-0.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.97%

-85.45%

+84.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.30%

-75.30%

+63.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.47%

10.84%

-6.37%

Volatility

CBSE vs. USO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Clough Select Equity ETF (CBSE) is 7.68%, while United States Oil Fund LP (USO) has a volatility of 14.97%. This indicates that CBSE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CBSEUSODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.68%

14.97%

-7.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.58%

38.35%

-20.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.55%

44.32%

-21.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.06%

36.09%

-12.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.78%

39.00%

-15.22%

CBSE vs. USO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBSE has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than USO's 0.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

CBSE vs. USO - Dividend Comparison

CBSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, while USO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
CBSE
Clough Select Equity ETF
0.26%0.35%0.37%1.50%0.52%
USO
United States Oil Fund LP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CBSE and USO have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USO has higher volatility (14.97%) compared to CBSE (7.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CBSE dropped -36.30% vs USO's -98.19%.

On 5-year performance, USO leads with 23.67% vs 12.51% for CBSE. On fees, CBSE is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, CBSE has been the lower-risk option at 7.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, USO has performed better with a 23.67% return vs 12.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CBSE is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for USO.

CBSE has the higher dividend yield at 0.26%, compared with 0.00% for USO.

CBSE is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while USO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Clough and USCF. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for CBSE and 0.86% for USO.

CBSE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CBSE and USO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer