PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CBSE vs. FTA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CBSE vs. FTA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Clough Select Equity ETF (CBSE) and First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FTA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CBSE having a 17.44% return and FTA slightly higher at 18.18%.


CBSE

1D
0.48%
1M
-8.06%
6M
10.14%
YTD
17.44%
1Y
22.91%
3Y*
24.56%
5Y*
10.41%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
16.07%

FTA

1D
-0.29%
1M
2.70%
6M
12.86%
YTD
18.18%
1Y
31.73%
3Y*
15.29%
5Y*
11.21%
10Y*
11.60%
ALL TIME*
8.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$202.38K$195.77K$371.19K
$3.06M$3.30M$2.95M

CBSE vs. FTA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
CBSE
Clough Select Equity ETF
17.44%19.53%32.20%17.29%-19.92%14.57%17.27%
FTA
First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund
18.18%14.94%10.13%10.08%-3.73%29.32%7.81%

Correlation

The correlation between CBSE and FTA is 0.30, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2020

0.62

Over the past year, the correlation between CBSE and FTA has dropped to 0.30 - well below their long-term average of 0.62, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CBSE vs. FTA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CBSE
CBSE Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
CBSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBSE Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
CBSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBSE Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

FTA
FTA Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
FTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTA Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
FTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTA Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CBSE vs. FTA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Clough Select Equity ETF (CBSE) and First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FTA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CBSEFTADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.46

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.56

5.93

-4.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.04

20.26

-16.23

CBSE vs. FTA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBSE Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is lower than the FTA Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBSE and FTA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CBSE vs. FTA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBSE drawdown since its inception was -36.30%, smaller than the maximum FTA drawdown of -62.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBSE and FTA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CBSEFTADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.30%

-62.45%

+26.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.57%

-5.13%

-8.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.40%

-18.73%

-10.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.30%

-19.80%

-16.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.97%

-1.56%

-10.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.13%

-8.97%

-3.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.24%

1.50%

+3.74%

Volatility

CBSE vs. FTA - Volatility Comparison

Clough Select Equity ETF (CBSE) has a higher volatility of 5.71% compared to First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FTA) at 3.93%. This indicates that CBSE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CBSEFTADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.71%

3.93%

+1.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.76%

8.04%

+12.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.56%

11.61%

+13.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.56%

16.23%

+8.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.07%

19.85%

+4.22%

CBSE vs. FTA - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBSE has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than FTA's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

CBSE vs. FTA - Dividend Comparison

CBSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%, less than FTA's 1.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CBSE
Clough Select Equity ETF
0.29%0.35%0.37%1.50%0.52%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FTA
First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund
1.61%1.89%2.02%2.10%2.15%1.54%2.03%1.88%2.28%1.53%1.56%2.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


CBSE and FTA have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CBSE has higher volatility (5.71%) compared to FTA (3.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CBSE dropped -36.30% vs FTA's -62.45%.

On 5-year performance, FTA leads with 11.21% vs 10.41% for CBSE. On fees, FTA is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, FTA has been the lower-risk option at 3.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FTA has performed better with a 11.21% return vs 10.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FTA is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for CBSE.

FTA has the higher dividend yield at 1.61%, compared with 0.29% for CBSE.

They also come from different issuers: Clough and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for CBSE and 0.60% for FTA.

FTA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CBSE and FTA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer