PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CBS5.L vs. AT1D.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CBS5.L vs. AT1D.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI US Liquid Corporates 1-5 Year Sustainable UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (CBS5.L) and Invesco USD AT1 CoCo Bond UCITS ETF USD Dist (AT1D.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBS5.L achieves a 0.23% return, which is significantly lower than AT1D.L's 2.72% return.


CBS5.L

1D
0.04%
1M
-0.74%
6M
-0.15%
YTD
0.23%
1Y
2.97%
3Y*
4.18%
5Y*
10Y*

AT1D.L

1D
0.16%
1M
0.34%
6M
1.47%
YTD
2.72%
1Y
7.48%
3Y*
10.04%
5Y*
3.61%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBS5.L vs. AT1D.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
CBS5.L
UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI US Liquid Corporates 1-5 Year Sustainable UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc
0.23%-0.23%6.03%0.27%-17.89%
AT1D.L
Invesco USD AT1 CoCo Bond UCITS ETF USD Dist
2.72%3.15%12.17%-3.30%2.35%

Correlation

The correlation between CBS5.L and AT1D.L is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 25, 2022

0.64

The correlation between CBS5.L and AT1D.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CBS5.L vs. AT1D.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBS5.L
CBS5.L Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
CBS5.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBS5.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBS5.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
CBS5.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBS5.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

AT1D.L
AT1D.L Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
AT1D.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AT1D.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
AT1D.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
AT1D.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
AT1D.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBS5.L vs. AT1D.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI US Liquid Corporates 1-5 Year Sustainable UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (CBS5.L) and Invesco USD AT1 CoCo Bond UCITS ETF USD Dist (AT1D.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CBS5.LAT1D.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.22

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.80

2.42

-1.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.01

6.82

-4.82

CBS5.L vs. AT1D.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBS5.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is lower than the AT1D.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBS5.L and AT1D.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CBS5.L vs. AT1D.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBS5.L drawdown since its inception was -23.09%, smaller than the maximum AT1D.L drawdown of -27.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBS5.L and AT1D.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CBS5.LAT1D.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.09%

-27.40%

+4.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.35%

-3.35%

-1.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.03%

-9.14%

+1.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.95%

-1.32%

-11.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.14%

-8.42%

-7.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.74%

1.19%

+0.55%

Volatility

CBS5.L vs. AT1D.L - Volatility Comparison

UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI US Liquid Corporates 1-5 Year Sustainable UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (CBS5.L) and Invesco USD AT1 CoCo Bond UCITS ETF USD Dist (AT1D.L) have volatilities of 1.68% and 1.70%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CBS5.LAT1D.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.68%

1.70%

-0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.27%

4.74%

-0.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.78%

6.49%

-0.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.42%

9.88%

+2.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.42%

14.08%

-1.66%

CBS5.L vs. AT1D.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBS5.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than AT1D.L's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

CBS5.L vs. AT1D.L - Dividend Comparison

CBS5.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AT1D.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.99%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
AT1D.L
Invesco USD AT1 CoCo Bond UCITS ETF USD Dist
5.99%6.07%6.14%6.24%5.79%4.25%5.63%5.59%1.12%
CBS5.L
UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI US Liquid Corporates 1-5 Year Sustainable UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CBS5.L and AT1D.L have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CBS5.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CBS5.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for AT1D.L.

CBS5.L is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while AT1D.L is Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds. CBS5.L tracks Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD, while AT1D.L tracks iBoxx USD Contingent Convertible Liquid Developed Market AT1 (8% Issuer Cap) Index. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for CBS5.L and 0.39% for AT1D.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CBS5.L and AT1D.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer