CBRS.DE vs. CAUT.DE
CBRS.DE (First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Acc) and CAUT.DE (Global X China Electric Vehicle and Battery UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) are both Technology Equities funds - CBRS.DE tracks the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity while CAUT.DE tracks the Solactive China Electric Vehicle and Battery. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CBRS.DE returned 22.06%/yr vs 1.53%/yr for CAUT.DE. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CBRS.DE charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for CAUT.DE.
Performance
CBRS.DE vs. CAUT.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CBRS.DE achieves a 25.88% return, which is significantly higher than CAUT.DE's 0.51% return.
CBRS.DE
- 1D
- -2.53%
- 1M
- 29.58%
- YTD
- 25.88%
- 6M
- 21.83%
- 1Y
- 19.50%
- 3Y*
- 22.06%
- 5Y*
- 15.64%
- 10Y*
- —
CAUT.DE
- 1D
- -2.17%
- 1M
- -12.56%
- YTD
- 0.51%
- 6M
- 5.19%
- 1Y
- 33.26%
- 3Y*
- 1.53%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CBRS.DE vs. CAUT.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBRS.DE First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Acc | 25.88% | -3.73% | 25.69% | 36.29% | -12.59% |
CAUT.DE Global X China Electric Vehicle and Battery UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 0.51% | 27.42% | 9.31% | -35.25% | -26.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between CBRS.DE and CAUT.DE is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2022 | 0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CBRS.DE vs. CAUT.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CBRS.DE
CAUT.DE
CBRS.DE vs. CAUT.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Acc (CBRS.DE) and Global X China Electric Vehicle and Battery UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (CAUT.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CBRS.DE | CAUT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.21 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.81 | 2.08 | -1.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.89 | 4.42 | -2.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CBRS.DE | CAUT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 | 1.18 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.73 | -0.27 | +0.99 |
Drawdowns
CBRS.DE vs. CAUT.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CBRS.DE drawdown since its inception was -28.84%, smaller than the maximum CAUT.DE drawdown of -69.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBRS.DE and CAUT.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CBRS.DE | CAUT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.84% | -69.24% | +40.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.94% | -15.89% | -8.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.84% | -42.32% | +13.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.84% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.23% | -43.96% | +40.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.34% | -45.53% | +35.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.27% | 7.51% | +2.76% |
Volatility
CBRS.DE vs. CAUT.DE - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Acc (CBRS.DE) has a higher volatility of 11.76% compared to Global X China Electric Vehicle and Battery UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (CAUT.DE) at 6.05%. This indicates that CBRS.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CAUT.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CBRS.DE | CAUT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.76% | 6.05% | +5.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.50% | 18.36% | +4.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.84% | 28.22% | -2.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.56% | 33.13% | -9.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.34% | 33.13% | -9.79% |
CBRS.DE vs. CAUT.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CBRS.DE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than CAUT.DE's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
CBRS.DE vs. CAUT.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CBRS.DE nor CAUT.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CBRS.DE and CAUT.DE have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CBRS.DE is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CBRS.DE is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for CAUT.DE.
CBRS.DE tracks Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity, while CAUT.DE tracks Solactive China Electric Vehicle and Battery. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for CBRS.DE and 0.68% for CAUT.DE.
Find the right allocation for CBRS.DE and CAUT.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer