CBRG vs. INFH
CBRG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CBRS Daily ETF) and INFH (Tidal Trust II - Defiance Daily Target 2X Long INFQ ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CBRG charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.31%/yr for INFH.
Performance
CBRG vs. INFH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CBRG
- 1D
- -9.02%
- 1M
- -45.68%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
INFH
- 1D
- 1.93%
- 1M
- -58.57%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CBRG vs. INFH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CBRG Leverage Shares 2X Long CBRS Daily ETF | -49.16% |
INFH Tidal Trust II - Defiance Daily Target 2X Long INFQ ETF | -73.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between CBRG and INFH is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2026 | 0.57 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CBRG vs. INFH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long CBRS Daily ETF (CBRG) and Tidal Trust II - Defiance Daily Target 2X Long INFQ ETF (INFH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CBRG vs. INFH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CBRG drawdown since its inception was -76.16%, roughly equal to the maximum INFH drawdown of -74.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBRG and INFH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CBRG | INFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.16% | -74.38% | -1.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -76.16% | -73.89% | -2.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.35% | -42.97% | +22.62% |
Volatility
CBRG vs. INFH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CBRG | INFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 156.46% | 195.98% | -39.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 156.46% | 195.98% | -39.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 156.46% | 195.98% | -39.52% |
CBRG vs. INFH - Expense Ratio Comparison
CBRG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than INFH's 1.31% expense ratio.
Dividends
CBRG vs. INFH - Dividend Comparison
Neither CBRG nor INFH has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CBRG and INFH have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CBRG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CBRG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for INFH.
CBRG and INFH have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CBRG and 1.31% for INFH.
Find the right allocation for CBRG and INFH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer