CBRE vs. ETN
CBRE (CBRE Group, Inc.) and ETN (Eaton Corporation plc) are both stocks. CBRE operates in Real Estate - Services (Real Estate), while ETN operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, CBRE returned 16.02%/yr vs 23.50%/yr for ETN. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CBRE vs. ETN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CBRE achieves a -18.09% return, which is significantly lower than ETN's 27.32% return. Over the past 10 years, CBRE has underperformed ETN with an annualized return of 16.02%, while ETN has yielded a comparatively higher 23.50% annualized return.
CBRE
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- -9.99%
- YTD
- -18.09%
- 6M
- -15.24%
- 1Y
- 2.44%
- 3Y*
- 18.61%
- 5Y*
- 8.15%
- 10Y*
- 16.02%
ETN
- 1D
- 1.82%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 27.32%
- 6M
- 18.09%
- 1Y
- 23.03%
- 3Y*
- 30.80%
- 5Y*
- 24.42%
- 10Y*
- 23.50%
CBRE vs. ETN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBRE CBRE Group, Inc. | -18.09% | 22.47% | 41.04% | 20.96% | -29.08% | 73.01% | 2.33% | 53.07% | -7.55% | 37.54% |
ETN Eaton Corporation plc | 27.32% | -2.79% | 39.51% | 56.22% | -7.18% | 46.70% | 29.88% | 42.76% | -10.04% | 21.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between CBRE and ETN is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2004 | 0.49 |
Over the past year, the correlation between CBRE and ETN has dropped to 0.16 - well below their long-term average of 0.49, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
CBRE:
$39.12B
ETN:
$156.90B
CBRE:
$4.37
ETN:
$10.22
CBRE:
30.12
ETN:
39.43
CBRE:
0.94
ETN:
5.52
CBRE:
4.59
ETN:
7.94
CBRE:
$42.17B
ETN:
$28.52B
CBRE:
$14.76B
ETN:
$7.87B
CBRE:
$2.68B
ETN:
$4.75B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CBRE vs. ETN — Risk / Return Rank
CBRE
ETN
CBRE vs. ETN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CBRE Group, Inc. (CBRE) and Eaton Corporation plc (ETN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CBRE | ETN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.14 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.09 | 1.21 | -1.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.21 | 2.63 | -2.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CBRE | ETN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 | 0.71 | -0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | 0.82 | -0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | 0.79 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.42 | -0.13 |
Drawdowns
CBRE vs. ETN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CBRE drawdown since its inception was -94.31%, which is greater than ETN's maximum drawdown of -68.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBRE and ETN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CBRE | ETN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.31% | -68.95% | -25.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.37% | -19.14% | -8.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.37% | -34.46% | +7.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.38% | -34.46% | -5.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.57% | -44.55% | -9.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.25% | -6.64% | -16.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.58% | -14.90% | -11.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.47% | 8.78% | +2.69% |
Volatility
CBRE vs. ETN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for CBRE Group, Inc. (CBRE) is 9.45%, while Eaton Corporation plc (ETN) has a volatility of 12.39%. This indicates that CBRE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ETN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CBRE | ETN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.45% | 12.39% | -2.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.73% | 25.71% | +0.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.56% | 32.58% | -2.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.25% | 30.03% | +0.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.01% | 30.01% | +3.00% |
Dividends
CBRE vs. ETN - Dividend Comparison
CBRE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ETN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBRE CBRE Group, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ETN Eaton Corporation plc | 1.06% | 1.31% | 1.13% | 1.43% | 2.06% | 1.76% | 1.88% | 3.00% | 3.85% | 3.04% | 3.40% | 4.23% |
Financials
CBRE vs. ETN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CBRE Group, Inc. and Eaton Corporation plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CBRE vs. ETN - Profitability Comparison
CBRE - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CBRE Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.85B and revenue of 10.53B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 17.6%.
ETN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Eaton Corporation plc reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 7.45B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
CBRE - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CBRE Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 511.00M and revenue of 10.53B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.9%.
ETN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Eaton Corporation plc reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 7.45B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
CBRE - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CBRE Group, Inc. reported a net income of 318.00M and revenue of 10.53B, resulting in a net margin of 3.0%.
ETN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Eaton Corporation plc reported a net income of 866.00M and revenue of 7.45B, resulting in a net margin of 11.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CBRE and ETN have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ETN has higher volatility (12.39%) compared to CBRE (9.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CBRE dropped -94.31% vs ETN's -68.95%.
ETN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.71 vs 0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CBRE and ETN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer