PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CBOY vs. SROI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CBOY vs. SROI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - July (CBOY) and Calamos Antetokounmpo Global Sustainable Equities ETF (SROI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBOY achieves a -0.37% return, which is significantly lower than SROI's 10.47% return.


CBOY

1D
0.48%
1M
0.16%
6M
-1.07%
YTD
-0.37%
1Y
-1.94%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SROI

1D
0.67%
1M
1.21%
6M
7.84%
YTD
10.47%
1Y
16.94%
3Y*
12.89%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBOY vs. SROI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CBOY and SROI is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2025

0.34

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CBOY vs. SROI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBOY
CBOY Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
CBOY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBOY Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBOY Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
CBOY Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBOY Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

SROI
SROI Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
SROI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SROI Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
SROI Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
SROI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
SROI Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBOY vs. SROI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - July (CBOY) and Calamos Antetokounmpo Global Sustainable Equities ETF (SROI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CBOYSROIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.90

1.22

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.49

1.67

-2.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.72

6.97

-7.69

CBOY vs. SROI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBOY Sharpe Ratio is -0.61, which is lower than the SROI Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBOY and SROI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CBOY vs. SROI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBOY drawdown since its inception was -3.99%, smaller than the maximum SROI drawdown of -15.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBOY and SROI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CBOYSROIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.99%

-15.38%

+11.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.99%

-10.19%

+6.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.18%

-1.32%

-1.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.29%

-2.40%

+0.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.71%

2.44%

+0.27%

Volatility

CBOY vs. SROI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - July (CBOY) is 0.92%, while Calamos Antetokounmpo Global Sustainable Equities ETF (SROI) has a volatility of 4.58%. This indicates that CBOY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SROI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CBOYSROIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.92%

4.58%

-3.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.54%

12.07%

-10.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.21%

14.27%

-11.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.26%

14.02%

-10.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.26%

14.02%

-10.76%

CBOY vs. SROI - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBOY has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than SROI's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

CBOY vs. SROI - Dividend Comparison

CBOY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, more than SROI's 0.54% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
CBOY
Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - July
1.37%1.37%0.00%0.00%
SROI
Calamos Antetokounmpo Global Sustainable Equities ETF
0.54%0.60%0.68%0.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


CBOY and SROI have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SROI has higher volatility (4.58%) compared to CBOY (0.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CBOY dropped -3.99% vs SROI's -15.38%.

On 1-year performance, SROI leads with 16.94% vs -1.94% for CBOY. On fees, CBOY is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, CBOY has been the lower-risk option at 0.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SROI has performed better with a 16.94% return vs -1.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CBOY is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SROI.

CBOY has the higher dividend yield at 1.37%, compared with 0.54% for SROI.

CBOY is categorized as Defined Outcome, while SROI is Global Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for CBOY and 0.95% for SROI.

SROI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.19 vs -0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CBOY and SROI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer