CBOX vs. CVRT
CBOX (Calamos Tax-Aware Collateral ETF) and CVRT (Calamos Convertible Equity Alternative ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CBOX is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Calamos, while CVRT is a Convertible Bonds fund actively managed by Calamos. Both are actively managed. Their 0.02 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. CBOX charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for CVRT.
Performance
CBOX vs. CVRT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CBOX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.40%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
CVRT
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -5.94%
- 6M
- 16.26%
- YTD
- 25.14%
- 1Y
- 44.00%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 28.80%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $7.89M | $8.89M | $7.14M | |
| $320.90K | $427.43K | $464.23K |
CBOX vs. CVRT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CBOX Calamos Tax-Aware Collateral ETF | 1.12% |
CVRT Calamos Convertible Equity Alternative ETF | 1.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between CBOX and CVRT is 0.02, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 17, 2026 | 0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CBOX vs. CVRT — Risk / Return Rank
CBOX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CVRT
CBOX vs. CVRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Tax-Aware Collateral ETF (CBOX) and Calamos Convertible Equity Alternative ETF (CVRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CBOX | CVRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.31 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.80 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.73 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CBOX vs. CVRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CBOX drawdown since its inception was -2.90%, smaller than the maximum CVRT drawdown of -20.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBOX and CVRT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CBOX | CVRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.90% | -20.71% | +17.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -15.77% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.30% | -12.25% | +9.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.47% | -3.34% | +1.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.12% | — |
Volatility
CBOX vs. CVRT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CBOX | CVRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.93% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 19.78% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.83% | 24.03% | -16.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.83% | 20.55% | -12.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.83% | 20.55% | -12.72% |
CBOX vs. CVRT - Expense Ratio Comparison
CBOX has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than CVRT's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
CBOX vs. CVRT - Dividend Comparison
CBOX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CVRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CBOX Calamos Tax-Aware Collateral ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CVRT Calamos Convertible Equity Alternative ETF | 1.58% | 1.68% | 1.49% | 0.32% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CBOX and CVRT have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CBOX is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CBOX is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for CVRT.
CVRT has the higher dividend yield at 1.58%, compared with 0.00% for CBOX.
CBOX is categorized as Options Trading, while CVRT is Convertible Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for CBOX and 0.69% for CVRT.
Find the right allocation for CBOX and CVRT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer