PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
CBON vs. YCS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

CBON vs. YCS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CBON (VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC China Bond ETF) and YCS (ProShares UltraShort Yen) are both exchange-traded funds - CBON is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the ChinaBond China High Quality Bond Index, while YCS is a Leveraged Currency fund tracking the USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CBON returned 2.93%/yr vs 12.34%/yr for YCS. At a correlation of -0.21, they often move in opposite directions. CBON charges 0.50%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for YCS.

Performance

CBON vs. YCS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC China Bond ETF (CBON) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBON achieves a 5.41% return, which is significantly lower than YCS's 7.17% return. Over the past 10 years, CBON has underperformed YCS with an annualized return of 2.93%, while YCS has yielded a comparatively higher 12.34% annualized return.

CBON

1D
0.10%
1M
1.75%
YTD
5.41%
6M
6.88%
1Y
9.26%
3Y*
5.05%
5Y*
2.03%
10Y*
2.93%

YCS

1D
0.17%
1M
4.42%
YTD
7.17%
6M
10.05%
1Y
32.82%
3Y*
19.84%
5Y*
23.54%
10Y*
12.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBON vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CBON
VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC China Bond ETF		5.41%5.46%1.85%2.92%-7.99%5.93%12.01%2.67%1.88%6.96%
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen		7.17%9.04%35.41%28.70%29.09%22.38%-11.18%3.37%-1.49%-6.57%

Correlation

The correlation between CBON and YCS is -0.29, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.33

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 2014

-0.21

The correlation between CBON and YCS shifts across timeframes, from -0.35 (3 years) to -0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC China Bond ETF

ProShares UltraShort Yen

Often compared with CBON:
CBON vs. PICBCBON vs. GRNBCBON vs. BNDXCBON vs. CEWCBON vs. MCHICBON vs. VGTCBON vs. ANGL
Often compared with YCS:
YCS vs. YCLYCS vs. JPYUSD=XYCS vs. PFIXYCS vs. TBTYCS vs. UUPYCS vs. BCSFYCS vs. SPY

Return for Risk

CBON vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
CBON
CBON Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
CBON Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBON Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBON Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
CBON Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBON Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
YCS
YCS Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
YCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
YCS Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
YCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
YCS Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBON vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC China Bond ETF (CBON) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

CBONYCSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.70
1.92

+0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
4.09
2.44

+1.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.35

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.94

3.97

+2.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

25.86

12.40

+13.46

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CBON vs. YCS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBON Sharpe Ratio is 2.70, which is higher than the YCS Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBON and YCS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

CBONYCSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.70

1.92

+0.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

1.12

-0.71

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

0.65

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.33

+0.09

Drawdowns

CBON vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBON drawdown since its inception was -14.13%, smaller than the maximum YCS drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBON and YCS.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

CBONYCSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.13%

-49.56%

+35.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.34%

-8.30%

+6.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.56%

-23.05%

+18.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.13%

-27.32%

+13.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.13%

-27.32%

+13.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.02%

0.00%

-0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.99%

-19.93%

+15.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.36%

2.66%

-2.30%

Volatility

CBON vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC China Bond ETF (CBON) is 0.91%, while ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) has a volatility of 2.75%. This indicates that CBON experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

CBONYCSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.91%

2.75%

-1.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.62%

12.32%

-9.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.45%

17.27%

-13.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.93%

21.10%

-16.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.58%

19.01%

-13.43%

CBON vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBON has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

CBON vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison

CBON's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, while YCS has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CBON
VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC China Bond ETF		1.52%1.66%2.15%3.01%2.70%3.05%2.87%3.87%3.39%3.33%3.25%2.78%
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

CBON and YCS have a correlation of -0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

YCS has higher volatility (2.75%) compared to CBON (0.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CBON dropped -14.13% vs YCS's -49.56%.

On 10-year performance, YCS leads with 12.34% vs 2.93% for CBON. On fees, CBON is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, CBON has been the lower-risk option at 0.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, YCS has performed better with a 12.34% return vs 2.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CBON is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.

CBON has the higher dividend yield at 1.52%, compared with 0.00% for YCS.

CBON is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. CBON tracks ChinaBond China High Quality Bond Index, while YCS tracks USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). They also come from different issuers: VanEck and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for CBON and 1.00% for YCS.

CBON currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CBON and YCS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer