CBOL vs. QSOL
CBOL (Calamos Laddered Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF) and QSOL (Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CBOL is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Calamos, while QSOL is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Lukka Prime Solana Reference Rate - Benchmark Price Return. CBOL is actively managed, while QSOL is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.82 means they have usually moved in the same direction. CBOL charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for QSOL.
Performance
CBOL vs. QSOL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CBOL achieves a -1.78% return, which is significantly higher than QSOL's -39.26% return.
CBOL
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- 6M
- -0.55%
- YTD
- -1.78%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
QSOL
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- -7.66%
- 6M
- -25.30%
- YTD
- -39.26%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $23.76K | $29.60K | $17.43K | |
| $134.00K | $79.87K | $98.31K |
CBOL vs. QSOL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CBOL Calamos Laddered Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF | -1.78% | -0.30% |
QSOL Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF | -39.26% | -4.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between CBOL and QSOL is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2025 | 0.82 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CBOL vs. QSOL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Laddered Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF (CBOL) and Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF (QSOL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CBOL vs. QSOL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CBOL drawdown since its inception was -5.05%, smaller than the maximum QSOL drawdown of -56.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBOL and QSOL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CBOL | QSOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.05% | -56.55% | +51.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.40% | -48.93% | +44.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.49% | -36.51% | +33.02% |
Volatility
CBOL vs. QSOL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CBOL | QSOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.64% | 69.18% | -65.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.64% | 69.18% | -65.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.64% | 69.18% | -65.54% |
CBOL vs. QSOL - Expense Ratio Comparison
CBOL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than QSOL's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
CBOL vs. QSOL - Dividend Comparison
CBOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.82%, more than QSOL's 0.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CBOL Calamos Laddered Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF | 1.82% | 1.79% |
QSOL Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF | 0.92% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CBOL and QSOL have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QSOL is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QSOL is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for CBOL.
CBOL has the higher dividend yield at 1.82%, compared with 0.92% for QSOL.
CBOL is categorized as Defined Outcome, while QSOL is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: Calamos and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for CBOL and 0.25% for QSOL.
Find the right allocation for CBOL and QSOL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer